Showing posts with label Judge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Judge. Show all posts

Saturday, July 6

Fox Searchlight should have paid interns, judge rules

Fox Searchlight should have paid interns, judge rules
Actress Natalie Portman is shown in a scene from the film "Black Swan" in this undated publicity photo released to Reuters January 25, 2011.
A Federal District Court judge in Manhattan ruled on Tuesday that Fox Searchlight Pictures had violated federal and New York minimum wage laws by not paying production interns, a case that could upend the long-held practice of the film industry and other businesses that rely heavily on unpaid internships.

In the decision, Judge William H. Pauley III ruled that Fox Searchlight should have paid two interns on the movie “Black Swan,” because they were essentially regular employees.

The judge noted that these internships did not foster an educational environment and that the studio received the benefits of the work. The case could have broad implications. Young people have flocked to internships, especially against the backdrop of a weak job market.

Employment experts estimate that undergraduates work in more than one million internships a year, an estimated half of which are unpaid, according to Intern Bridge, a research firm.

“Employers have already started to take a hard look at their internship programs,” said Rachel Bien, a lawyer for the plaintiffs. “I think this decision will go far to discourage private companies from having unpaid internship programs.”

Chris Petrikin, a spokesman for 20th Century Fox, said: “We are very disappointed with the court’s rulings. We believe they are erroneous, and will seek to have them reversed.”

Eric Glatt and Alexander Footman, production interns on “Black Swan,” sued Fox Searchlight in September 2011. In the suit, Mr. Glatt and Mr. Footman said they did basic chores, usually undertaken by paid employees. Like their counterparts in other industries, the interns took lunch orders, answered phones, arranged other employees’ travel plans, tracked purchase orders, took out the trash and assembled office furniture.

“I’m absolutely thrilled,” said Mr. Glatt, who has an M.B.A. from Case Western Reserve University. “I hope that this sends a very loud and clear message to employers and to students doing these internships, and to the colleges that are cooperating in creating this large pool of free labor — for most for-profit employers, this is illegal. It shouldn’t be up to the least powerful person in the arrangement to have to bring a lawsuit to stop this.”

In the ruling, the judge said unpaid internships should be allowed only in very limited circumstances.

Judge Pauley rejected the argument made by many companies to adopt a “primary benefit test” to determine whether an intern should be paid, specifically whether “the internship’s benefits to the intern outweigh the benefits to the engaging entity.” Judge Pauley wrote that such a test would be too subjective and unpredictable.

Instead, the judge forcefully called for following criteria that the Department of Labor has laid out for unpaid internships. Those rules say unpaid internships should not be to the immediate advantage of the employer, the work must be similar to vocational training given in an educational environment, the experience must be for the benefit of the intern and the intern’s work must not displace that of regular employees.

Some employers have asserted that they have free rein not to pay interns as long as the interns are receiving college credit. But Judge Pauley said receiving academic credit was of little importance in determining whether interns should be paid.

“Undoubtedly Mr. Glatt and Mr. Footman received some benefits from their internships, such as resume listings, job references and an understanding of how a production office works,” Judge Pauley wrote. “But those benefits were incidental to working in the office like any other employees and were not the result of internships intentionally structured to benefit them.” Judge Pauley added that “Searchlight received the benefits of their unpaid work, which otherwise would have required paid employees.”

The “Black Swan” case was the first in a series of lawsuits filed by unpaid interns.

In February 2012, a former Harper’s Bazaar intern sued Hearst Magazines, asserting that she regularly worked 40 to 55 hours a week without being paid. Last July, a federal court ruled that the plaintiff could proceed with her lawsuit as a collective action, certifying a class of all unpaid interns who worked in the company’s magazines division since February 2009. This February, an unpaid intern sued Elite Model Management, seeking $50 million.

After a lawsuit brought by unpaid interns, Charlie Rose and his production company announced last December that they would pay back wages to as many as 189 interns. The settlement called for many of the interns to receive about $1,100 each — amounting to roughly $110 a week in back pay, for a maximum of 10 weeks, the approximate length of a school semester.

As part of his ruling on Tuesday, Judge Pauley also granted class certification to a group of unpaid interns in New York who worked in several divisions of the Fox Entertainment Group.

Copyright © 2013 The New York Times

Friday, June 22

Judge is not Steve Jobs offers from trial bar

SAN FRANCISCO - Steve Jobs gave unity quotes much juicier, before he died, and Apple Inc has failed, some of them of an upcoming patent lawsuit against Google's Motorola mobility, to keep after a court decision.

Apple and Motorola are planned for a high profile patent test in a Federal Court in Chicago this month. It is one of the several intellectual property between tech giants on smart phones and tablets running Google's Android operating system.

Apple's iconic and often outspoken Chief Executive resigned, jobs until shortly before his death last year. But Walter Isaacson had discussed with biographer jobs Apple's patent litigation.

"Our complaint says ' Google, you fucking iPhone, wholesale RIP us to crack ',", jobs Isaacson said. "Grand Theft."

He added: "I am ready, go on this thermonuclear war."

In a court Apple submit last month, acknowledged, that jobs was "very angry" about Google's behavior.

"Possible prejudice to Apple to avoid, if Motorola tried to use the book to appeal to the jury passion" says the submission, "Apple requires that all references to the book of jobs prevent the Court during the trial."

In a brief order filed Thursday Chicago Federal Judge Richard Posner Apple's request is rejected without explanation.

Representative for Apple and Motorola has not immediately responded to requests for comment.

Apple has also said that it federal judge of Isaacsons of its upcoming patent against Samsung Electronics, for July to hold planned study book ask a California.

In a separate order on Thursday, Posner prohibit Apple from argues that the judges, to prefer Apple to Motorola if they like Apple products, or admire you should be predisposed jobs.

"I forbid to the jury to insinuate that this case is a popularity contest, Apple," Posner wrote.

Apple Inc. is the case in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois And next Software Inc. V. Motorola, Inc. and Motorola mobility, Inc., 11-cv-8540.

(C) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2012.

Friday, July 8

Judge committed themselves, Strauss-Kahn share

NEW YORK — Smiling faintly as he walked out of court, former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn was released from house arrest Friday after prosecutors acknowledged serious questions about the credibility of the hotel maid who accused him of sexual assault.

FBI secretly tracked man without warrant Blow things up! A defense of 'Transformers' China may be next victim of a debt crisis FDA probes new death, infections from wipes First Thoughts: Another summer of Obama's discontent? Bahrain to citizens living abroad: Spy — or else America the beautiful — in pictures

The charges against him stand — for now, at least. But weeks after saying it had a strong case that was only getting stronger, the district attorney's office was on the defensive. So was the housekeeper's lawyer, who continued to insist that Strauss-Kahn had violently abused the woman.


An attorney for Strauss-Kahn, meanwhile, called the turn of events "a great relief." The case underscores "how easy it is for people to be charged with serious crimes and for there to be a rush to judgment," William W. Taylor said.


Strauss-Kahn, 62, had been confined for weeks to a luxury New York City townhouse on $6 million bail after his arrest on attempted rape charges that forced his resignation as head of the International Monetary Fund and appeared to destroy any hope he had of running for president of France next year.


But then, on Friday, defense lawyers went into court to ask that his bail conditions be eased, with prosecutors' assent.

Timeline: Dominique Strauss-Kahn (on this page)

"The strength of the case has been affected by the substantial credibility issues regarding" the accuser, Assistant District Attorney Joan Illuzzi-Orbon told the judge, who then canceled Strauss-Kahn's bail and most of the other restrictions.


Just hours after his release from house arrest, Strauss-Kahn left the townhouse and dined out at Scalinatella, a pricey Italian restaurant on Manhattan's Upper East Side.


It was his first taste of freedom since he was taken from a Paris-bound jetliner on May 14 and arrested on charges of sexually assaulting the maid.


'Truth and facts'
According to prosecutors, the woman admitted she lied to a grand jury about what she did immediately after the alleged attack. She actually went on cleaning rooms instead of reporting the episode right away, prosecutors told the defense in a letter.


She also told prosecutors a tearful, vivid but untrue story of having been gang-raped in her native Guinea, later admitting it was among various false accounts of oppression that she had been told to memorize to enhance her 2004 application for political asylum, prosecutors said.


A source familiar with the case told NBC News that investigators uncovered past incidents where the accuser was untruthful. On her asylum application, "she lied extensively, including information about a claim of having been raped," the source said.


When asked by prosecutors about the past rape claim, she recounted the story "in a believable way," the source told NBC News. When questioned again, she admitted to those prosecutors that "she lied to them ... and on the application about the whole rape claim."


And she claimed someone else's child as her own dependent and lied about her income on tax forms, prosecutors said.


Her lawyer, Kenneth Thompson said the illiterate woman received bad advice that she needed to "hype" her petition for U.S. asylum.


A victim of female genital mutilation, she did not want the same fate to befall her daughter but did not know that would be enough to qualify for asylum, Thompson said. Instead she told a story of political prosecution.


District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance Jr. portrayed the turnabout as a case of prosecutors doing the right thing.


"Our commitment to the truth and the facts will govern how we proceed" in the Strauss-Kahn case, he told reporters.


Neither he nor Strauss-Kahn's lawyers took questions.


Authorities have not said specifically what they now think of the truthfulness of the woman's allegations against Strauss-Kahn. Investigators found traces of his semen on her uniform, and that is powerful evidence there was a sexual encounter of some kind, though the defense has said anything that happened was not forced.


Still, the apparent lies about her background and her behavior could seriously damage her credibility as a witness if the case goes to trial.


Edward A. McDonald, a defense lawyer and former federal prosecutor and assistant district attorney in New York City, said dropping the case could be next. Prosecutors are "sending a real clear sign that they've gotten to the point where they think there is little hope of rescuing the case," he said.


Another hearing is set for July 18. Strauss-Kahn did not get his passport back and will not yet be allowed to leave the country, but he will be free to travel within the U.S., his lawyers said.


Strauss-Kahn himself remained mum Friday, but he strode confidently up the granite steps to the courthouse with his wife, French journalist Anne Sinclair, at his side, after they arrived in a Lexus SUV. After the short hearing, he slowly walked out the building with his arm on her shoulder, smiling at the crowd outside.


Moments later, the accuser's attorney, Kenneth Thompson, fired back.


"It is clear that this woman made some mistakes, but that doesn't mean she's not a rape victim," the lawyer said.


Claims of violent attack
The 32-year-old hotel maid accused Strauss-Kahn of chasing her through his luxury suite in May, trying to pull down her pantyhose and forcing her to perform oral sex. Thompson said Strauss-Kahn bruised the woman's genitals, tore a ligament in her shoulder and ripped her stockings.


"From day one, she has described a violent sexual assault that Dominique Strauss-Kahn committed against her," Thompson said. "She has described that sexual assault many times, to prosecutors and to me, and she has never once changed a single thing about that encounter."


He accused the district attorney of shying away from the high-profile case and blasted as lies media reports that the woman was involved with a drug dealer.


The New York Times, citing unidentified law enforcement officials, reported that the woman was recorded on the phone with a boyfriend incarcerated in an immigration jail in Arizona soon after she made the allegations against Strauss-Kahn.


The conversation was in a dialect of Fulani, a language from the woman's native Guinea, a law-enforcement official told the Times.


“She says words to the effect of, ‘Don’t worry, this guy has a lot of money. I know what I’m doing,’ ” the official said, according to the newspaper.


Strauss-Kahn was held without bail for nearly a week after his May arrest. His lawyers ultimately persuaded a judge to release him by agreeing to an ankle monitor, surveillance cameras and armed guards. The security measures were estimated to cost him as much as $200,000 a month, on top of the $50,000-a-month rent on the townhouse in the city's TriBeCa section.


Prosecutors at the time wanted him kept him in jail, arguing that because of the seriousness of the charges, he might flee the country. In releasing Strauss-Kahn on Friday, State Supreme Court Justice Michael Obus said: "In light of recent developments, the risk that you would not be here appears to have receded quite a bit."


If the case collapses, it could once again shake up the race for the French presidency. Before the scandal, Strauss-Kahn, a prominent Socialist, had been seen as a leading potential challenger to conservative President Nicolas Sarkozy. French politician Michele Sabban said the Socialists should suspend the presidential primary calendar because of the new developments.


The new doubts about Strauss-Kahn's accuser could also feed suspicions in France that he was the victim of a politically motivated setup.


Indeed, Maxime Laumailler, an economics student from Rennes, France, who was standing outside the New York courthouse, called the case "a plot" against Strauss-Kahn.


"We are so surprised that the Americans are pre-judging him like this," said Laumailler's girlfriend, Charlotte LeBihan.


After Friday's hearing, Strauss-Kahn returned to the brick townhouse. A deliveryman arrived a few hours later with an arrangement of red, white and blue balloons, along with one shaped like the Statue of Liberty.


The card read, "Enjoy your freedom on Independence Day," said deliveryman Sean Hershkowitz. He said he didn't know who sent the greeting.


NBC News, The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this story.

Site Search