Showing posts with label after. Show all posts
Showing posts with label after. Show all posts

Monday, December 23

Don't stop investing after retirement

Don't stop investing after retirement
| By Timothy McCarthy, U.S. News & World Report

If you've made it this far, chances are you'll live longer than average, and an overly conservative portfolio won't cut it. Here are three ways to keep your money growing through retirement, but diversified against risk.

Too many investors think they should switch to overly conservative investing after they retire. Some mistakenly move too large of a portion of their money into fixed-income investments and cash.

It is surprising that so often, people think they will live to the average age of the population, or until around 77 to 80 years. What they don't realize is a key concept called "given or conditional probability." Given that you are already over 60, the reality is that you have a new average life expectancy.

After all, you survived all those wild years of your youth. Hence, if you and your spouse already in your 60s, thinner than me, don't smoke and have no major illness, guess what? At least one of you is more than likely to fly by 90 years old. That means your money has to last for 30 more years!

You need your money to keep growing after you retire. And remember, you don't want to run out of money six months before you pass. You have to make sure your money lasts longer than you.

What's the remedy? It used to be that if you just left your money in the bank and bought some bonds, you could be assured of growing your money at 4 or 5 percent a year. However, those days are long gone, especially when inflation is factored in.

Naturally, you may say to yourself, "I don't want to risk losing my money. After all, I can't make it over again." What can you do to grow your money at an average of 4 to 5 percent a year while keeping your risks low? The secret lies in getting the right asset classes in your portfolio and then leaving it alone.

There is no such thing as a no-risk investment. But a broadly diversified portfolio left alone to grow for decades can allow your money to grow, yet as a whole, be just as safe as money left in the bank. But how do you make sure you get the mixture right?

Here are three components to diversifying your portfolio for long-term safety.

Make sure to have small portions of many different asset classes and management styles in your overall portfolio to smooth out the volatility over time. Although much attention is given to trying to pick the best-performing mutual funds, it turns out that better long-term growth at reduced risk comes more from good diversification rather than fund selection.

This mixture of assets should include all levels of equities, large-cap, small-cap, various industries, different styles, both active and passive funds, plus a variety of corporate and government bonds, mixing short and long-term duration. Make sure to include other asset classes like real estate investment trusts and even a dose of a variety of commodities, from timber to gold to oil and gas.

As you age, you will very slowly reduce portions of the higher-volatility asset classes; for instance, larger blue chip stocks with higher dividend yields will replace the small-cap, more volatile growth stocks. Still, the secret is not making too big of a bet on any one asset class or style.

Despite the massive economic improvements of many countries around the world, the news still scares many away from investing overseas. Yet one of the most important ways to decrease your portfolio volatility while increasing your return is to make sure to have a significant minority of your assets invested in highly rated overseas securities.

The reality is that growth in the U.S., Europe and Japan is slowing as our populations age. But the good news is that there is a select group of about 20 countries, including Chile, Poland and Thailand, that have already emerged and will continue to grow at a rate much higher than the "old countries," and yet, as a basket, will be diversified enough to keep your volatility relatively low.

In your retirement years, it is best to stay out of the more "frontier countries" as they remain too volatile. However, the safer portion of the "growth countries," as a whole, could actually turn out to be safer than just investing in the U.S. It's fine to have the majority of your money in the U.S. in the 21st century, but it is no longer wise to have your entire core portion invested in only one country.

Of all the diversification techniques you can employ, time, by far, is the most powerful. Indeed, we have seen again how much patience matters. In the crash of 2008, if you only took out enough money that you would need to live on, for instance, one-thirtieth of all your money, then you would have only suffered a loss on that small portion. And after only five years, the various markets have recovered. Thus, only taking each year what you need to live on is critical.

Of course, you may slowly reduce first from the more growth-oriented volatile asset classes as you age, but remember, at least a significant portion of your money needs to keep growing even into your 80s.

What should your non-cash portfolio look like when you're 72?

Naturally, every person is different. Needing to spend money sooner for your own unique reasons alone can alter these percentages dramatically. Thus, a range of suggested portfolio weightings is much more helpful. The portfolio below is stated in wide ranges because as you age, you will want to move to the lower percentages of investment in these classes and more into cash and short-term funds. Just remember to do it slowly -- only a little movement each year.

Sample recommendation for a 72-year-old person:

U.S. equities: 15 to 30 percentInternational equities (including growth countries): 5 to 10 percentFixed income, U.S. government and corporate bonds: 40 to 55 percentFixed income, international bonds: 5 to 15 percentReal estate investment trust funds (REITs): 3 to 8 percentA mixture of commodities: 2 to 4 percent
Understandably, people will have their personal prejudices against certain investments. However, it is critical not to totally ignore any category. Having zero money invested overseas, for instance, actually adds risk to your portfolio.

For many people, their home is one of their most important assets. But remember, you have high concentration and liquidity risk in your house investment, so it is best to make sure you have a solid investment portfolio in financial assets as well.

The above portfolio structure will help ensure that no matter how long you live, you won't be a financial burden on your family.

Tuesday, November 5

Facebook may flop after earnings

Facebook may flop after earnings
| By Jeff Reeves, MarketWatch

The stock can't keep up this run for much longer — and investors who are sitting on big profits may be wise to sell now rather than risk steep declines.

Facebook (FB) has doubled in just a few short months, sparked by better-than-expected second-quarter earnings in July, and is up over 170 percent in the last year.

And while it's unfashionable to badmouth this social-media stock as it approaches its next earnings report, count me among the Facebook bears.

I think that even if Facebook manages to post decent numbers this week when it reports earnings, the stock can't keep this run up for much longer — and investors who are sitting on big profits may be wise to sell now rather than risk steep declines.

Here's why I refuse to "like" Facebook stock.

The biggest reason to be bearish on Facebook is that domestic and European users have flatlined. I personally expect the company to post a decline in its U.S./Canada segment this quarter, or next quarter at the very latest.

That is not going to be a pleasant headline when FB sees its first-ever drop in U.S. users after its massive growth… just look at the fireworks in Netflix (NFLX) after its subscriber drop at home as a case study.

This is disturbing for obvious reasons in regard to the saturation of these markets and how it will affect growth, but it's even more disturbing when you consider that growth in emerging markets comes with only a fraction of the revenue.

Consider these figures from Facebook's last earnings report:

U.S./Canada

Users: 198 million, or 17.1 percent of FB totalRevenue per User: $4.32
Europe

Users: 272 million, or 23.5 percent of FB totalRevenue per User: $1.87
Asia

Users: 339 million, or 29.4 percent of FB totalRevenue per User: $0.75
Rest of World

Users: 346 million, or 30.0 percent of FB totalRevenue per User: $0.63
U.S./Canada is by far the most lucrative region by geography, with Europe an obvious second.

But consider that from the first quarter to the second quarter of 2013, Facebook grew its monthly active users less than 1 percent quarter-over-quarter, and year-over-year growth was a measly 6 percent.

In its second-quarter numbers, Facebook reported that $848 million in revenue — almost half of its $1.8 billion in total revenue on the quarter — came from users in the U.S. and Canada. So even a small rollback here is going to be felt, and the lack of future upside is significant.

The situation is the same in Europe as well. Europe's monthly active users increased just 1 percent from the first quarter to the second, and a modest 10 percent over the second quarter of 2012.

The Facebook longs better be sure that this user base is going to stick, or else they are in serious trouble.

The bulls may contend that the problem, then, isn't growing the Western audience, but simply monetizing it better. And, oh, by the way, if you make more money off those "rest of the world" subscribers, then it won't take quite so many of them to offset lost U.S. revenue if the users do roll back.

Sunday, October 20

After the shutdown, a big rally?

After the shutdown, a big rally?
| By Jim Jubak

Assuming that end the shutdown without disaster, can investors to expect a rally in December. But then old sure how China and the United States will creep back.

It's hard to take your eyes off the Government shutdown/ceiling debt crisis in Washington, for the same reason, that we in a car accident rubber corner:

Disaster is fascinating.

But let us for the time being to snatch way our eyes and look further down the road.

Solved provided, this crisis is behind financial Armageddon--get and I believe that it, although probably only with a debt of U.S. bad global financial markets - then clatters what?

Even let me to forward to look at the rest of the year, and in 2014, what probably is on the markets.

First, and I think we can all agree, we get a relief rally, when this mess is over. (This almost universal belief in a relief rally may be of course the reason stocks declined yet not very far and that the markets have created very many bargains.)

We have already seen a good example at the end of last week, if the optimism, the White House and House Republicans were close to a deal in the amount soared. We have a very impressive 2.2% rally in the standard & poor's 500 ($INX) on Thursday, the 10th October, and a decent 11 follow 0.63% on Friday, Oct.

Recovered even more strongly than the U.S. markets, the markets and stocks, which was harder hit by the fear of a US default and the resulting flight to safety. This applied in particular to emerging markets, which had suffered from their usual relatively larger decline, if anxiety among the Anlegern--increases, even if they are not the source of fear. iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO), for example, 3.6% increase on Oct. The iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) climbed 3.2% and iShares ETF MSCI Turkey (TUR) increased by 2.8%.

How long the relief rally is and how big it is, depends on it, how quickly the economic anxieties that mind were preying on the market at the forefront of investors think back. Keep in mind, back against the US budget and debt ceiling? The fears were pointed tapered from its $85 billion in monthly buying of US Treasury obligationen 1) as inevitably get you start with slow growth in China and 2) of the US Federal Reserve, and mortgage-backed securities?

Over the weekend, the Chinese Government announced exports fell unexpectedly in September. Exports fell by 0.3% from September 2012. economists survey by Bloomberg 5.5% had expected export growth. In August exports had increased by an annual rate of 7.2%. (Imports climbed 7.4% in September more than economists had predicted.)

Jim Jubak

You will recall, is the concern that China's economic growth below the Government target of 7.5% for the year will fall. Last week, China's Prime Minister Li Keqiang, that China's GDP grew up by more than 7.5% in the first nine months said 2013.

It is unlikely that China's official any deviation from the target of the Government in the run-up to the November meeting of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, the economic policies used and discuss are devoted to how the economic policy of the country and of the socialism with Chinese characteristics to integrate. The official data is extremely unlikely to rock the boat before this meeting, but whether this data is reliable is another question. And if it is not, the real growth of the Chinese economy what is evident in the performance of the world economy say the official Chinese figures. A forecast that growth in China will miss the Government ' goal was a key reason that the International Monetary Fund its forecast for the economic growth of the world 2014 to 3.6% in 2014 from a July forecast of 3.1% in the year of 2013 and 2014 3.8% and 2.9% in 2013 cut.

On the evidence of what happened this year fears of Chinese economic growth lower than I expected, if emerging economies hard hit, believe a return on emerging markets would cut by these fears in a. Worries about the speed of growth China would also downward pressure on their stocks and raw materials management, as well as and could revive doubts about the speed of economic recovery in the euro area.

Second back at markets some time to try to predict when the Federal Reserve of their cone starts. Markets moved strongly in September as markets ever more convinced that the US economy was weak enough and uncertain enough to each candle on the Fed purchases in October pushed the situation in Washington or higher.

This view has been confirmed, if the Fed surprise at its meeting Sept. 18 cone does not.

Friday, September 20

5 years after the crisis: Blame Washington or Wall Street?

| By Suzanne McGee, The Fiscal Times

Five years after the crisis peaked with the collapse of Lehman Brothers, it is still possible to hear bankers claim that Washington forced them to take risks. That claim simply doesn’t have much merit, however.

It all started with a house and a mortgage.

The first is a hallmark of American society, representing the ideal of home ownership: About two-thirds of our fellow citizens own the house or apartment in which they live, encouraged to do so by factors that include being able to deduct the interest on their mortgage payments. And it is the ready availability of those mortgages that has enabled them to buy those houses in the first place.

When the financial crisis brought the entire system to its knees five years ago, the heart of the problem wasn't some esoteric investment strategy but something fairly basic: poor-quality mortgage loans, repackaged by banks and other institutions in such a way as to temporarily mask their weakness. Banks had always made these subprime loans -- issuing mortgages to borrowers with poor credit quality, or financing purchases of homes for buyers who weren't putting anything down themselves. But that had been a fraction of their business, perhaps 8% of all new mortgages in a year. By 2006, the percentage had grown to 20% nationwide, and was far higher in some parts of the country, even as homeowners were taking on debt they simply couldn't afford.

As all the postmortems take place around the fifth anniversary of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, one of the most significant questions boils down to whether it was the financial institutions that made these loans and then restructured and resold them that should bear the blame for the near-meltdown of the system. Or, as others argue, was the crisis the fault of Washington (a convenient code word for politicians, regulators and their rules)?

One of those on Wall Street now viewed as having been blind to the problems that were taking shape in the mortgage world, former Citigroup (C) CEO Charles Prince, may go down in history for his comment that "as long as the music is playing, you've got to get up and dance." That is, as long as the subprime mortgage lending market was moving along and generating big profits for the industry as a whole, no bank could afford to sit it out and allow all those gains to flow to its rivals.

In the wake of the crisis, however, those who believe the blame for the near-meltdown can be laid at Washington's door seized on Prince's phrase as a way to explain what they think happened. In their view, policies ranging from the Alternative Mortgage Transactions Parity Act (which greatly increased the ranks of lenders allowed to write adjustable-rate, interest-only and other kind of mortgages that became so popular among subprime lenders) to the Community Reinvestment Act (which tried to stop discrimination in lending, but which some argue forced banks to lend to home buyers with poor credit) were responsible for the dramatic increase in subprime loans and the increase in leverage in the years leading up to the crisis. Moreover, they argue, other policies resulted in inadequate regulatory supervision of the institutions taking those risks.

Around the first anniversary of the collapse of Bear Stearns, on St. Patrick's Day of 2009, the issue came up for a formal debate at an event organized by Intelligence Squared U.S. The ranks of those arguing that Washington was more culpable included historian Niall Ferguson, who suggested that if Chuck Prince and his fellow Wall Street CEOs were dancing to the music, "you have to ask yourselves … who was playing the music." It wasn't that Ferguson didn't blame banks, he insisted, just that he and his fellow debaters blame Washington more.

Balderdash.

Five years after the crisis peaked with the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the forced merger of Merrill Lynch with Bank of America (BAC), and the near-implosion of many other institutions, it is still possible to hear bankers claim, with straight faces, that Washington forced them to take risks. That claim simply doesn't have much merit, however.

Let's first consider it from a common-sense perspective. How willing are banks to do things that they know in their gut are foolish or ill-conceived simply because the government wants them to? If anything, recent history has shown that they put their self-interest first -- and rightly so. Rock-bottom interest rates haven't sparked a flurry of new lending in the wake of the crisis; burned by the mortgage debacle, banks are guarding against credit risk more than they are abiding by the government's clear interest in seeing lending rise in order to fuel economic growth.

Historically, when banks haven't wanted to comply with a government rule or regulation, they have a tremendous track record in compelling whatever body is responsible to reverse the decision, PDQ. Remember that it was lobbying by banks, not by the government, that finally led to the collapse of the Glass-Steagall Act more than 60 years after it had been passed. If they could succeed in demolishing such a bedrock of financial regulation, could they really have been forced into acting against their best judgment by weaker, newer rules? It seems far more probable that these were rules they could live with or work around, or even rules that some of them believed would help make them more money.

Sunday, September 15

Five years after the crisis: what banks have not learned

¦ By Suzanne McGee, the fiscal times

A near-death experience can be life-changing. But the mindset of big bank executives has changed little since they narrowly escaped the 2008 financial meltdown they helped cause.

This week brings with it two rather bleak Anni verse Aries. It has been 12 years since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and five years since Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy as part of the 2008 crisis that nearly brought the global financial system to its knees.

Along with remembrance, these milestones should bring a that sense we have learned enough to ensure that history doesn't repeat itself, or at least a sense that the pain and misery is receding.

In the case of the financial crisis, at least, I'm not sure that we can say so. For proof, look no further than JPMorgan Chase (JPM), which emerged from the crisis a big winner. The bank had sailed in to buy Bear Stearns and prevent its collapse in March 2008 that what hardly a public service (it gave JPMorgan a big boost in Wall Street league tables, and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon picked up the assets for a song, with government help), but it may so have sent the wrong message to the rest of Wall Street that their own institution would be too big to fail.

Be that as it may, JPMorgan Chase came through the crisis relatively stronger than it had been. But take a look at some of the comments and disclosures it made only this week, during a presentation to the Barclays Global financial services Conference in New York, and it becomes clear that five years after the crisis, we have yet to put many problem behind US.

And even the winners still have a lot to learn.

JPMorgan Chase is the biggest of these, and critics including Sheila Bair, former head of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., aren't at all confident that any of them have a good strategy for addressing the "too big to fail" conundrum. That means that if a future risk management snafu or business misjudgment trigger the collapse of a big financial institution, we could be right back at square one.

While JPMorgan Chase CFO Marianne Lake bragged about the bank's giant market share and capital position at the Barclays conference, Bair's broader point is that that child of market share brings systemic risk with it, and unless and until there's a workable "resolution" structure in place, the size of some of these of institutions today is still worrying.

Nor do many of Wall Street's critics draw much comfort from the Federal Reserve's annual stress tests - especially after the last one showed Citigroup (C) as being more resilient than JPMorgan.

"That's just downright odd," one analyst back in the spring told me, when those results were released.

The financial crisis what a reminder of how often Wall Street failed to ask itself the - "what might go wrong here?" - and failed to put in place systems that most basic child of question would increase the odds of identifying the biggest sources of risk before they morphed into large losses and write-downs.

Risk management - which, after all, isn 't a profit center but instead eats into returns on equity – still isn't embedded in Wall Street's DNA.

JPMorgan Chase is a great example of that, as the "London whale" trading losses reminded everyone last year. The bank's own reports on the problematic trades displayed myriad gaps in risk management, including evidence that some of the bank's managers manipulated internal risk models. Two of the directors who served on the bank's risk committee stepped down in July. JPMorgan Chase announced on Sept. 9 their replacements both have solid track records in finance; one of them, Linda Bammann, is a banking exec with risk management expertise.

But why wait five years to do this?

Government agencies have been busy filing lawsuits of all kinds against Wall Street institutions, many of them related to the way mortgage securities were originated, packaged, priced and sold before the crisis.

At JPMorgan Chase, the federal government and its agencies are conducting criminal investigations into the mortgage-backed securities operations as well as its energy-trading activities. other investigations target the London whale losses, the bank's credit card collections policies and activities and the way it handles mortgage foreclosures and guards against money-laundering.

Not all of these problems are historic in nature; the energy trading kerfuffle has surfaced only in the last year. New or old, the cost of defending against these allegations information, paying fines to settle regulatory claims and providing against other penalties, is climbing.

Lake, the chief finance officer, told her conference audience on Sept. 9 that to increase to the bank's litigation reserve to address a "crescendo" of these actual and potential lawsuits wants "more than offset" the $1.5 trillion of consumer loan loss reserves that will be released as credit quality when the bank's loan portfolio has improved. "We are still finalizing the number," she said.

Back in 2008, "subprime" ones stuck banks were with big portfolios of mortgages, and especially low-quality. They had been lending foolishly, assuming that they could always repackage those loans in such a way as to make them look appealing to someone out there.

Fast forward five years and the mortgage arena once more is a problem area for banks such as JPMorgan Chase. This time it isn't a question of losses, but of revenue - or rather, a steep decline in revenues from the home-lending business that the bank is likely to see as interest Council rise.

Mortgage-refinancing demand has falling Lake said this week that 60% from its peak in may, sooner and more rapidly than the bank had expected. Add that to competitive pressures and the time it takes to complete 'taking expenses of the system' out (translation: eliminating some jobs in this part of the business) and profit margins here want to be negative. At least this time, the mortgage business is likely to be only a drag on profits rather than a big question mark hanging over the future of the industry.

None of these are reasons to panic or to expect a re-run of the events of 2008 what is disconcerting, however, is the limited extent to which big financial institutions have changed the way they function in the wake of their near-death experience.

New regulations have been slow to emerge and have had unintended consequences. others haven't even materialized.

On the part of the banks themselves, a new mindset may be even further away today than it in the autumn of 2008, when CEOs and CFOs were still scared silly by the narrowness of their escape from complete disaster.

Wednesday, October 24

Stocks drop after Alcoa loss, Chevron warning

Updated at 4:02 p.m. ET: Stocks fell sharply Wednesday, a day after the earnings season opened with Alcoa posting a quarterly net loss and Chevron saying profits would fall sharply in its most recent period.

After hitting lows in the early afternoon, stocks briefly trimmed losses after the Federal Reserve said in its Beige Book report that the economy was expanding modestly.

Shares of Alcoa slid and weighed on the Dow industrials following the U.S. aluminum producer's report late Tuesday of a quarterly net loss, which it linked to a slump in the price of aluminum and weak demand.

Chevron Corp shares fell and were the biggest drag on the S&P 500 after the second-largest U.S. oil company said third-quarter profits would be "substantially lower" than in the previous quarter. Chevron said a hurricane and planned maintenance had curtailed its oil and gas output, while a fire hurt its refining business.

"I think the poor earnings for the third quarter are baked into the market. If that were the only issue I think there would be limited downside," said William Delwiche, investment strategist at Robert W. Baird & Co in Milwaukee.

"But what matters now is the outlook for the fourth quarter and 2013. So far it seems to be one of more caution, and if that trend continues that could be a headwind for stocks."

The S&P 500 index saw its fourth day of declines on worries about deteriorating profits due to weak global demand. S&P 500 companies' third-quarter earnings are expected to fall 2.9 percent from a year ago, which would be the first decline in three years, according to Thomson Reuters data.

The Fed's Beige Book said consumer spending, prices and employment conditions have changed little since the last report in late August but that the overall economy had expanded modestly, with most districts seeing strengthened home sales in the last month.

"The Beige Book can help us trade higher once we get through this nervous period," said Jake Dollarhide, chief executive officer of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. "There's a lot of negative sentiment in the market after what was three, even four straight weeks of gains."

The larger economic backdrop is also casting a shadow. The International Monetary Fund and the World Bank recently cut their global outlooks as the Eurpoean debt crisis drags on.

Shares of Yum Brands Inc climbed and ranked as the S&P 500's best performer. Yum, the parent company of KFC, Taco Bell and other fast-food restaurant chains, raised its full-year profit forecast after sales in China held up despite slowing growth in that market.

Shares of Wal-Mart Stores Inc, a Dow component, hit an all-time high after Chief Executive Officer Mike Duke said the retailer was gaining widespread market share.

Warehouse chain Costco Wholesale Corp reported a 27 percent jump in quarterly profit on higher sales and membership fees.

Engine maker Cummins Inc lowered its 2012 forecast for a second time this year and said it would cut up to 1,500 jobs.

FedEx Corp said it plans to cut costs at its underperforming express air freight and services divisions, with a goal of improving profits at those operations by $1.7 billion over the next four years. Reuters contributed to this report.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Thursday, October 18

Consumers, after brief rest, start saying 'charge it' again

WASHINGTON -- U.S. consumer credit rebounded strongly in August after posting its first decline in nearly a year in July, Federal Reserve data showed on Friday.

The rebound would likely be interpreted as a short-term boon to growth, though it could bode ill for household balance sheets if it is not accompanied by a rise in real wages, which have been stagnant.

U.S. consumer credit rose $18.12 billion, the biggest gain since May, following July's revised $2.45 billion decline. Revolving credit, which mostly measures credit-card use, climbed $4.2 billion. Nonrevolving credit, which includes student and auto loans, rose $13.92 billion.

Credit has been expanding almost continuously since mid-2010 as the country recovered from the 2007-2009 recession. The decline in July was the first drop since August of last year.

A sharp drop in the U.S. jobless rate to 7.8 percent in September, reported on Friday by the Labor Department, suggested the economic recovery, while weak, continues to muddle along. (Reporting By Pedro Nicolaci da Costa; Editing by Neil Stempleman)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters.

Friday, October 5

Bank of America exec loses millions after court says you can't moon your boss

You almost have to admire Jason Selch.

Back in 2005, Selch ended a meeting with his bosses at Bank of America by pulling down his pants and mooning them.

Most of us would, at the very least, understand that this would be not just the end of the meeting but the end of our job. You can get away with a lot of things in corporate America, but mooning your boss isn't one of them.

The self-confidence of Selch, however, is made of sterner stuff than that. Selch not only thought he shouldn't be fired. He took Bank of America to court when they fired him for the mooning.

Selch had been a Chicago-based employee at Wanger Asset Management for more than decade when it merged with Columbia Asset Management, a subsidiary of Bank of America, in 2005.

As so often happens in these Wall Street mergers, some of the employees of Wanger weren't happy with the way the new bosses planned to pay them. Bank of America, in particular, has a bad reputation for trying to squeeze the compensation packages of bankers and advisers at firms it acquires.

According to court documents, Selch's friend Chris O'Dea was fired after he refused to accept lower compensation. This ticked Selch off. (Hat tip: Court House News.)

Selch burst into a conference room where executives from Columbia were meeting to give them a piece of his mind. He wound up giving them a piece of something else as well.

First Selch asked if he had a non-compete agreement, which on Wall Street is usually a way of threatening to quit and go to work for a competitor.

After the executives said he didn't have a non-compete, Selch mooned them, told one of the New York-based executives never to return to Chicago, and left the meeting.

Extraordinarily, Selch wasn't fired. Instead he was issued a formal warning. Selch’s boss testified that while 99 percent of employees would have been immediately fired, Selch was one of the one percent who could be granted a one-free-mooning reprieve. The executive actually fought for Selch to keep his job.

When Columbia CEO Brian Banks found out about this incident, he insisted that Selch be fired. The behavior was too “egregious” to allow Selch to continue at Columbia. No free mooning at Bank of America, Banks decided — even if you are in the one percent.

The firing meant that Selch lost a multi-million contingent bonus package that would have vested if he had remained at the company a few months more. Because he was fired, Bank of America got the keep the money.

Selch sued, arguing that firing him after issuing a warning was a breach of contract. The warning had said he could be fired if he misbehaved in the future — yet after that one mooning, by all accounts Selch was well-behaved. What’s more, Selch argued that because the mooning didn’t interfere with his official duties, he couldn’t be fired “for cause.”

The trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants in the suit. Last Wednesday, a 3-judge appeals panel upheld the trial court, describing the mooning as “insubordinate, disruptive, unruly and abusive.”

So, just in case it was unclear, you can’t moon your boss and expect to keep your job. Or your bonus.

Ever made a dramatic exit from a job? Tell us about it.

Thursday, September 20

Facebook hits another low after downgrade

The FMHR traders offer reasons why the market is fading despite Ben Bernanke's remarks at Jackson Hole. Meanwhile Facebook's price target gets cut to $15 from $25 at BMO. And Dennis Gartman, The Gartman Letter, offers insight on the commodities rally f...

Shares of Facebook are down again Friday, hitting a new all-time low after BMO Capital Markets cut its price target on the social networking company.

Facebook stock price was lately down 4.4 percent at $18.25. The social network’s share price hit a new low of $18.19 Friday, and is down 52 percent from its May 18 initial offering price of $38.

BMO Capital Markets noted that several lock-up expirations over the next year will weigh on Facebook’s stock price. BMO cut its price target by $10 to $15, and said Wall Street sentiment on Facebook is now much worse than advertiser sentiment.

"We expect investor attention to return to fundamentals after the technical challenges presented by lock-up expirations over the next six months have been absorbed by the stock," BMO analysts said in a research note.

Shares of game publisher Zynga, which derives most of its revenue from Facebook, slid 2 percent to just under $3 amid reports that executives Bill Mooney and Brian Birtwistle have left the company amid slowing sales and a weakening stock price.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Friday, August 3

McDonald's shares fall after earnings upset

Bryan Elliott, Raymond James, and Matthew DiFrisco, Lazard Capital Markets, break down McDonald's lower-than-expected quarterly numbers, hurt by a slowing global economy and stronger dollar.

McDonald’s shares fell 2.5 percent to $89 Monday after the fast-food company’s chief executive said lower-than-expected quarterly earnings “reflected the slowing global economy [and] persistent economic headwinds.”

The world’s biggest fast-food chain company said weak consumer demand and the hindrance from the stronger U.S. dollar hurt business. A stronger dollar reduces the value of sales overseas for U.S. companies.

“You are starting to see signs that consumers are spending less at restaurants,” said Morningstar analyst R.J. Hottovy. “You are also seeing increased competition.”

McDonald’s net income fell to $1.35 billion during the second quarter, down 4 percent from $1.41 billion reported in the same quarter the year before. The restaurant chain said it expects same-store sales to go up in July, but less than they did in the second quarter.

“While the environment has become more challenging, we continue to see significant opportunities to further differentiate and grow the McDonald’s brand,” McDonald’s Chief Executive Officer Don Thompson said.

“We have the resources and discipline to invest for the long-term benefit of our System and our shareholders,” he added.

The broader stock market tumbled Monday, with the Dow sinking sharply, amid fears about the stability of key European economies as the region’s debt crisis intensifies.

Wednesday, June 13

Storied law firm folds after partners flee

The crippled law firm Dewey & Leboeuf LLP filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection Monday night and will seek approval to liquidate its business after failing to find a merger partner, marking the biggest collapse of a law firm in U.S. history.

Once one of the largest law firms in the U.S., Dewey has been hit by the loss of the vast majority of its roughly 300 partners to other firms amid concerns about compensation and a heavy debt load.

Dewey had warned employees earlier this month of the possibility the firm may shut down, and a person familiar with the matter had told Reuters that the firm was considering a bankruptcy filing.

"Dewey's failure is rocking the industry in the sense that most firms are saying to themselves, if Dewey could go down, could we?" Kent Zimmermann, a legal consultant at the Zeughauser Group, said in an email Monday night.

Dewey said in a filing it had decided to wind down its business following unsuccessful negotiations with other law firms to strike a deal. It said it would ask about 90 employees to remain on staff to assist in the liquidation, which it expects to be completed in the next few months.

Negative economic conditions, along with the firm's partnership compensation arrangements, created a situation where its cash flow was insufficient to cover capital expenses and full compensation expectations, Dewey said.

"During the first quarter of 2012, the firm was confronted with liquidity constraints that led to the precipitous resignation of over 160 of the firm's 300 partners by May 11," the New-York based firm said.

Dewey listed liabilities in the range of $100 million to $500 million, according to the filing. It had already terminated 433 of its 533 New York employees earlier this month, according to the state's labor department.

Turbulence
The firm's collapse is expected to be the subject of years of court proceedings, and a number of former partners have already retained lawyers to represent them.

Monday's filing follows months of turbulence, as wave after wave of partner defections shattered the high-profile firm from within. In April, the Manhattan District Attorney's office launched a criminal probe of former firm chairman Steven Davis. He has denied any wrongdoing.

The result of a 2007 merger between Dewey Ballantine and LeBoeuf, Lamb, Green & MacRae, Dewey & LeBoeuf had about 1,450 attorneys at its peak, according to The National Law Journal.

But the firm was eventually undone by a combination of the economic downturn, excessive compensation and governance problems, according to former partners and others in the industry. In particular, Dewey's management promised millions in packages to about 100 partners, according to the court filing, leaving it strapped for cash when revenues fell during the recession.

Dewey has retained Joff Mitchell of Zolfo Cooper LLC as Chief Restructuring Officer and Albert Togut of Togut Segal & Segal LLP as bankruptcy counsel.

"The full extent of the partner compensation arrangements is subject of continuing investigation," Mitchell said in the filing.

Dewey is one of a handful of major law firms to declare bankruptcy since the recession that began in 2007. They include Coudert Brothers, Heller Ehrman and Howrey.

Pensions plans
As of the petition date, Dewey's assets consisted of about $13 million in cash, accounts receivable of about $255 million, various pieces of artwork, and about $11 million invested in an insurance consortium, among other potential claims, according to the filing.

In the interim, Dewey said the firm will be operating on a budget to be determined by the court. The firm has petitioned the court for permission to continue to pay salaries, benefits and paid time-off for current employees.

Dewey said that the 401(k) plans and qualified pension plans of its current and former employees and partners are held in trust and cannot be accessed by the firm's creditors.

The U.S. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation filed suit this month to take control of three of the firm's pension plans, which the agency said were underfunded by $80 million.

The London and Paris offices of the firm are operated through a separately incorporated UK entity, which was placed into administration on Monday.

Administration is a UK legal process under court supervision, broadly similar to Chapter 11. The UK partnership is following broadly the same approach as that of Dewey in the United States, the firm said.

The firm had two dozen offices worldwide, including in Washington, Los Angeles and London. Some of the firm's biggest clients included General Motors Corp, eBay, Novartis, Ambac and Berkshire Hathaway Reinsurance Division.

The case is Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP, Case No. 12-12321, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2012.

Wednesday, May 30

Facebook stocks trim gains after early pop


Facebook on EPA

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg Rings NASDAQ Opening Bell from Menlo Park, California

Updated at 16: 00 ET: after more than 10 percent at the start of trading, shares of Facebook jump back undressed in their market debut Friday, proposes a cooler than expected reception for one who observed the most initial public offerings of stock of the last years.

Facebook share jumped to $43 in the first trade, about 13 percent from an IPO price of $37. But the stock was soon some his first jump and fell as low as $38 in the first half-hour of trading, at the point of IPO underwriters was its price, support, according to reports. Facebook shares eventually closed at just over $38.

The broader stock market was lower Friday, with social media among biggest losers of the day. Shares of LinkedIn, Pandora, and GroupOn were all lower.

Facebook's opening delayed trade. Shares due to originally begin trading on the NASDAQ Stock Exchange at 11 A.m. ET, was but by about 30 minutes as an experienced trader problems with change and cancel reports of orders, that they had sent to the NASDAQ, the Wall Street Journal.

Despite the technical difficulties, retail was very strong demand for the Facebook offering, dealers said CNBC component of 15 to 25 percent with an expected retail. Trading volume in Facebook 100 million shares in the first three minutes of trading the camp exceeded, the magazine said.

Facebook's market reception was unusual. Others have seen the last large Internet IPOs strong starts, including LinkedIn, which went public almost exactly one year at $45 per share before and at $94 on a volatile day of trading above saw their shares closed $122 at one point.

Related: Want a piece of Facebook? Here is what you need to know

This means that investors, could get luck to the tender offer price book an immediate paper profit of more than 100 percent, or "mirror" shares and cash. Other investors were numbers as much as $122 per share for LinkedIn on this day and with paper losses. (LinkedIn shares currently trading for about $100.)

GroupOn, another the last Internet IPO, jumped 27 percent on the day of its opening.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg reminds staff that the company aims to make the world more open and connected. Then he rings the opening bell.

Earlier Friday, Facebook rang founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg the opening bell for the NASDAQ stock market in Facebook shares of Facebook are based in Menlo Park, California now trading on the NASDAQ under the symbol "Department." (You can track the performance of Facebook share price here).

Facebook went after the close of trading Thursday at $38 per share, a landmark increase more than 100 billion $ $16 billion initial public offering, the company values.

Investment banks, the Organization has set the price range at the upper end of the range of $34 to $38 per share estimated by Facebook in a regulatory filing earlier this week.

The offer values at $38 per share the eight-year-old company $104 billion initial public offering of the greatest debut has market for an Internet company. There are more than $16 billion for Facebook and selling shareholders, including Zuckerberg, ultimately could be raised and up to $18.4 billion, assuming that the underwriters exercise their option for "Overallotments" to strong demand.

Related: Facebook founder Zuckerberg opens trading on NASDAQ

Zuckerberg updated his profile on Facebook Friday morning, with his company on the NASDAQ market.

Facebook has enjoyed a remarkably rapid growth. In just eight years, the company from a college service in a Harvard dorm has founded to the third largest public offer of shares of in U.S. history, after has gone offers from General Motors, and visa.

The sky high rating of Facebook, puts it a bit before the Web veteran Amazon.com, which is more than 10 times Facebook has sales of $3.7 billion. But Facebook is growing fast and posted $1 billion US$ 631 million profit last year more than Amazon's.

Associated press contributed to this report.

Facebook is the much-hyped debut on Wall Street Friday morning, and it is shaping up to one of the largest IPOs ever, with analysts predicting that the social network is estimated at more than $100 billion. Today Savannah Guthrie raises a look whether it does justice to the stock to the hype.

Saturday, February 4

Google shares slump after rare earnings miss

Shares of Google Inc fell 8 percent after the Internet giant posted a rare quarterly earnings miss and said money paid by marketers for its search ads decreased for the first time in two years.


The search giant underperformed on both revenue and earnings, despite record U.S. online commerce during the holiday season, prompting several brokerages to cut their price targets on the stock.


Google shares were down $50.77 at $588.80 in late morning trade on Friday on the Nasdaq. They had touched a low of $584.81. It was the stock's biggest percentage fall in 9 months.


About 5.2 million shares changes hands by 1120 ET, more than their daily average volume.


The broader Nasdaq composite index was down 0.25 percent.


Google executives blamed the decline in search ad rates on forex fluctuations and ad format changes but analysts wondered whether mobile advertising -- which has lower rates -- played a more important role than the company admitted.


The fall in cost per click (CPC) had led to a barrage of questions from analysts during the post-earnings conference call on Thursday.


The market needs to shift expectations to paid click growth and lower its estimates for CPC, Goldman Sachs analysts said in a note.


Google's heavy investments in mobile and social network initiatives -- to stave off competition from rivals Apple Inc and Facebook -- and its planned $12.5 billion acquisition of smartphone maker Motorola Mobility Holdings have also raised investors' concerns.


Larry Page, who took over as CEO in April, said in July that the company was moving to put "more wood behind fewer arrows."


Analysts said the company has seen growth in display advertising, its Android mobile platform and Google+.


Google+ -- its recently-launched social network -- has 90 million users now, up from 40 million three months ago.


Wall Street analysts called the selloff an overreaction; Barclays said it presents a buying opportunity.


"Don't judge a book by its cover," Goldman Sachs titled its research note on Google.


The company's core results were solid as paid click growth accelerated by more than a third, margins improved, and display and mobile businesses performed well, analysts said.


The acceleration in paid clicks suggests that underlying demand for Google ads is quite healthy across devices, JP Morgan said, adding Google is best-positioned for the shift to new media.


Goldman Sachs analysts said, "We expect the growth in mobile to be 146 percent in 2012 and represent 15 percent of gross sales as we exit fourth-quarter of 2012."


The company still has strong earnings power that will reappear during 2012, Canaccord Genuity said, reiterating its "buy" rating.


Barclays, Baird, Jefferies and JP Morgan also maintained their top ratings on the stock.


Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters.

Sunday, November 27

Qantas cleared to fly again after fleet grounding

CANBERRA, Australia — Qantas Airways was expected to resume flying Monday after an Australian court intervened in a labor dispute that led the airline to ground its entire fleet over the weekend.


By the time the labor-relations court acted, several hundred flights had been canceled and tens of thousands of passengers stranded around the world.


Some airline industry experts say Qantas' surprise grounding of its entire fleet Saturday could cause many travelers to book future trips on other airlines.


Qantas CEO Alan Joyce said he had no choice but to order the lockout of union workers and end months of rolling strikes that led to canceled flights, $70 million in losses and a collapse in future bookings.


Joyce told the Australian Broadcasting Corp. that he expected some flights to resume by mid-afternoon Monday. It was unclear how long it would take for the airline to resume a full schedule. The airline had estimated that it would lose $20 million a day during the lockout.


The Australian labor-relations court issued its ruling ending the standoff early Monday morning — midday Sunday in the United States — after holding an emergency hearing that included testimony from company, labor union and government officials.


The president of the labor-arbitration panel, Geoffrey Giudice, said the group acted to protect Australia's tourism and aviation industry.


The airline said 447 flights had been canceled in the first 24 hours of the lockout. Qantas did not immediately update that figure.


Qantas is the largest of Australia's four national domestic airlines, carrying about 70,000 passengers a day on a fleet of 108 planes that operate in 22 countries. It is the 10th largest airline in the world by passenger miles flown, according to the International Air Transport Association, an airline trade group.


Its major international destinations include Singapore, Hong Kong and London. In the United States, Qantas flies to Los Angeles, Dallas, New York and Honolulu.


Travelers reported being ordered to leave planes that were already on the tarmac when the lockout began Saturday. More than 60 planes in mid-flight flew to their destinations, then were parked.

Don't miss these Travel stories Tastes and sounds of Montreal lure US tourists These days, Montreal is selling itself to U.S. tourists as more than just poutine and a port.

Burglar targets traveling Facebook friends Power your gadgets with your own bag 8 most complicated countries to visit Be prepared for worst-case travel scenarios

Qantas said it paid to rebook passengers on other airlines, including compensating those who had to pay higher last-minute fares to get home.


For several weeks, workers have carried out rolling strikes and refused to work overtime to demand higher pay and protest the airline's plans to cut about 1,000 jobs. Qantas, which has about 32,500 employees, wants to reduce costs by creating new Asia-based airlines for international flying. International flights were a roughly $200 million drain on the company last year.


The company reported in August that annual profit had doubled. But it said the business climate was too turbulent — partly because of labor turmoil — to forecast future earnings.


Henry Harteveldt, an airline industry analyst in San Francisco, predicts the shutdown will do long-term damage to the Qantas name by hurting its reputation for reliability.


"A lot of travelers won't take a chance and will book away to Virgin Australia, Air New Zealand and other airlines," Harteveldt said. "Brand loyalty in the airline business is very low, and there is so much competition."


Before the court ruling, Virgin Australia said it was scheduling extra flights and offering 20 percent fare discounts to help stranded Qantas passengers through Thursday.


If Qantas loses customers, that could also hurt partners in its alliance of global airlines, including American Airlines. A rival alliance that includes Air New Zealand and is led by United Continental Holdings Inc. could benefit. So could a third group of airlines that includes several major Asian carriers and is led by Delta Air Lines Inc. and Air France-KLM.


Other industry veterans said the lockout was a daring move that will pay off for Qantas, which wants to expand the low-cost, low-fare model that it uses at its Jetstar Airways subsidiary.


Jetstar has extensive routes to Southeast Asia and Japan, and lower costs than Qantas. But Qantas unions fear that expansion of low-cost airlines will result in Australian jobs being sent overseas. CEO Joyce hopes to bend the unions closer to the company's vision for growth by tapping into Asian markets.


"It was a very shrewd move by their CEO to force the issue and stop the potential deterioration of the brand," said Mo Garfinkle, an airline consultant who has worked for Qantas rival Virgin Australia. "In the end, it will benefit Qantas financially."


Garfinkle said the short duration of the fleet grounding will help Qantas get back up to full speed quickly, cutting its losses.


Rod McGuirk in Canberra, Australia, contributed to this report.


© 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Sunday, November 20

Qantas cleared to fly again after fleet grounding

CANBERRA, Australia — Qantas Airways was expected to resume flying Monday after an Australian court intervened in a labor dispute that led the airline to ground its entire fleet over the weekend.


By the time the labor-relations court acted, several hundred flights had been canceled and tens of thousands of passengers stranded around the world.


Some airline industry experts say Qantas' surprise grounding of its entire fleet Saturday could cause many travelers to book future trips on other airlines.


Qantas CEO Alan Joyce said he had no choice but to order the lockout of union workers and end months of rolling strikes that led to canceled flights, $70 million in losses and a collapse in future bookings.


Joyce told the Australian Broadcasting Corp. that he expected some flights to resume by mid-afternoon Monday. It was unclear how long it would take for the airline to resume a full schedule. The airline had estimated that it would lose $20 million a day during the lockout.


The Australian labor-relations court issued its ruling ending the standoff early Monday morning — midday Sunday in the United States — after holding an emergency hearing that included testimony from company, labor union and government officials.


The president of the labor-arbitration panel, Geoffrey Giudice, said the group acted to protect Australia's tourism and aviation industry.


The airline said 447 flights had been canceled in the first 24 hours of the lockout. Qantas did not immediately update that figure.


Qantas is the largest of Australia's four national domestic airlines, carrying about 70,000 passengers a day on a fleet of 108 planes that operate in 22 countries. It is the 10th largest airline in the world by passenger miles flown, according to the International Air Transport Association, an airline trade group.


Its major international destinations include Singapore, Hong Kong and London. In the United States, Qantas flies to Los Angeles, Dallas, New York and Honolulu.


Travelers reported being ordered to leave planes that were already on the tarmac when the lockout began Saturday. More than 60 planes in mid-flight flew to their destinations, then were parked.

Don't miss these Travel stories Stranded JetBlue pilot pleaded for help from airport A recording of transmissions between a JetBlue pilot and Bradley International Airport near Hartford, Conn., captured the pilot's frustration at being stuck on the runway during a snowstorm for more than seven hours on Saturday.

Disabled vet says airline left her to sit in own urine Take a trip ... with a little help from friends Cemetary tourism: 'It's great to be alive in Colma!' Norwegian Gem diverts cruise to rescue sailors

Qantas said it paid to rebook passengers on other airlines, including compensating those who had to pay higher last-minute fares to get home.


For several weeks, workers have carried out rolling strikes and refused to work overtime to demand higher pay and protest the airline's plans to cut about 1,000 jobs. Qantas, which has about 32,500 employees, wants to reduce costs by creating new Asia-based airlines for international flying. International flights were a roughly $200 million drain on the company last year.


The company reported in August that annual profit had doubled. But it said the business climate was too turbulent — partly because of labor turmoil — to forecast future earnings.


Henry Harteveldt, an airline industry analyst in San Francisco, predicts the shutdown will do long-term damage to the Qantas name by hurting its reputation for reliability.


"A lot of travelers won't take a chance and will book away to Virgin Australia, Air New Zealand and other airlines," Harteveldt said. "Brand loyalty in the airline business is very low, and there is so much competition."


Before the court ruling, Virgin Australia said it was scheduling extra flights and offering 20 percent fare discounts to help stranded Qantas passengers through Thursday.


If Qantas loses customers, that could also hurt partners in its alliance of global airlines, including American Airlines. A rival alliance that includes Air New Zealand and is led by United Continental Holdings Inc. could benefit. So could a third group of airlines that includes several major Asian carriers and is led by Delta Air Lines Inc. and Air France-KLM.


Other industry veterans said the lockout was a daring move that will pay off for Qantas, which wants to expand the low-cost, low-fare model that it uses at its Jetstar Airways subsidiary.


Jetstar has extensive routes to Southeast Asia and Japan, and lower costs than Qantas. But Qantas unions fear that expansion of low-cost airlines will result in Australian jobs being sent overseas. CEO Joyce hopes to bend the unions closer to the company's vision for growth by tapping into Asian markets.


"It was a very shrewd move by their CEO to force the issue and stop the potential deterioration of the brand," said Mo Garfinkle, an airline consultant who has worked for Qantas rival Virgin Australia. "In the end, it will benefit Qantas financially."


Garfinkle said the short duration of the fleet grounding will help Qantas get back up to full speed quickly, cutting its losses.


Rod McGuirk in Canberra, Australia, contributed to this report.


© 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Saturday, March 19

Japan stocks plunge on the first trading day after quake

BANGKOK - the Tokyo Stock market crashed waste to cities on the coast of Japan's Northeast Monday, his first business day after an earthquake and tsunami of epic proportions, caused tens of billions of dollars in damage. Other Asian markets were mostly down.

Oil prices dropped in the vicinity of $99 per barrel, after the disaster threatens the world's third largest economy in a recession, send demand for crude oil crimping. In currencies, the dollar against the yen and the euro fell.

The benchmark Nikkei 225 stock average dived 633.94 points or 6.18 percent, to close - 9,620.49 wipe out achievements in 2011 when the collision with the lowest level in four months. On Friday, including massive power deficiencies that could interfere with factories, a broad sell-off raised concerns about the economic effects of the disaster, which hit all sectors. The broader Topix index fell by 7.5 per cent.

Shares of several large corporations sell orders were overwhelmed with and had still trade. The Tokyo Electric Power Co. was set up under which, from double-digit fall, since it with to rollenden power outages in parts of Tokyo and its suburbs announce faulty nuclear reactors and a lack of power who fought the company led.

Do with nuclear power companies such as those that build nuclear power plants, registered staggering losses, including Hitachi Ltd., to 16.2 per cent, and Toshiba Corp., down 16.3 percent. Mitsubishi heavy industries fell by 10 percent and Kobe steel Ltd., fell 6.4 per cent.

Shares in other sectors was also big hits as investors shares on concerns about the economic production and consumption threw. Automakers slipped as Northeastern Japan one of the most important centres for automatic production is complete with a variety of suppliers and a network of roads and ports for the efficient distribution.

Large manufacturer stopped production around the country. Toyota Motor Corp., the world's largest automaker, fell 7.9 percent; Honda lost 6.5%; and Nissan fell 9.5 percent. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. lost 11.8% and Isuzu Motors Ltd. fell 9.2 percent.

Insurance companies - many of which face is severe claims for lost objects and infrastructure probably - was also sharp drops, including Tokio Marine Holdings Inc., by 12.4 percent. Cosmo oil, whose refinery of the 8, 9-brightness-quake, slipped by devastating 21.6 percent to fire since is.

Analysts said that the forecast for the Japanese economy in the close future strong whether it might depending on the affected nuclear power plant of avert Fukushima Dai-Ichi reactor of meltdowns to. Damage reported four nuclear plants in the north-eastern Japan, but the danger was greatest in the Dai-Ichi plant.

"All costings, economic and humanitarian, remain easy depending on the resolution of the difficulties on nuclear power facilities, where two reactors are believed, have experienced to partial meltdowns." Authorities have in the facilities, which lost to coolant earthquake replace sea water pumps and prevent so on meltdown. The degree to which this was successfully vague remains, "said analysts at DBS Bank Ltd., in Singapore in a report."

Meanwhile, the industrial and business rose on expectations that they benefit from Japan's reconstruction efforts. Japanese construction company Kajima Corporation rose by 22.2% and Nishimatsu construction co., Ltd. jumped 19.3 percent.

Quake death toll surges in Japan result that massive earthquake and tsunami increased the death toll from Friday Monday as some 2,000 bodies found were Miyagi, Kyodo news on both sides in the Agency reported. New explosion nuclear power plant increased fears Japan nuclear health risks is low, not blow in the overseas international rescue effort gathers in Japan Japan's earthquake: such as to show images help Japanese quake, identity Dateline NBC Keith Morrison presents a photographic essay emotional images hit, emerged from the aftermath of the earthquake of Japan and resonate with their national identity.  Japan earthquake aftershocks Quake since the first 8, 9-brightness, has Japan has been added by scores of aftershocks. See on this map. Pictures of chaos, destruction, 8, 9-magnitude quake, tsunami cause enormous damage.

Elsewhere, lost Hong Kong Hang Seng index 0.2 percent to 23,204.06 during South of Korea's Kospi by 0.8 per cent to 1,971.23. mainland China Shanghai composite index rose less than 0.1 per cent to 2,935.41. The Shenzhen composite index of China's Exchange smaller, second rose by 0.9 per cent to 1,310.99.

Shares in Taiwan, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, and the Philippines were lower. Benchmarks in Indonesia and Thailand increased.

The Bank of Japan, earlier Monday, injected money markets to try to defend the already weak economy a record 15 trillion yen ($ 183,8 billion). By flooding the banking system with cash, money hopes the Central Bank further banks borrow and meet the increase probably demand after the earthquake Fund. A one day policy meeting of the Central Bank is to to stop later Monday.

On Wall Street on Friday finished stocks down in the week with modest gains. The Dow Jones industrial average gained 59.79 points, or 0.5 percent to 12,044.40. The S & P 500 rose 9.17 or 0.7 percent to 1,304.28. The NASDAQ Composite gained 14.59 or 0.5 percent to 2,715.61.

The prospect of a decline in demand for oil from Japan crude oil prices sent down $1.57, to $99.59 per barrel. In addition to the earthquake, oil prices fell for a scheduled day protests in Saudi Arabia drew only a few hundred people. Oil traders were worried the violence in the Middle East and North Africa to the world's number one oil exporter would spread.

Benchmark crude oil April delivery declined $1.79 at $99.37 per barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The contract lost $1.54 to $101.16 on Friday.

The yen emerged shortly after Friday quake, but then restored. The dollar was brought on Monday after hitting a three week high of 83.30 yen immediately after the earthquake lower against the yen to 82.07. euro $1.3933 $1.3890 late Friday.

Copyright 2011, the associated press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or distributed.

Site Search