Showing posts sorted by date for query insurance. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query insurance. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Thursday, May 1

6 high-priced loans and how they work

6 high-priced loans and how they work
Business Week | By Mitchell D. Weiss, Credit.com

There are plenty of loan options available, even for low-income borrowers with iffy credit. Proceed with extreme caution, though.

There are lots of cash-strapped consumers out there who, for all practical purposes, are closed out of many traditional credit product offerings because of the high default risk they’re presumed to represent. But that doesn’t mean the financial services industry hasn’t figured out ways to profit from their plight. After all, the “unbanked” and “under-banked” demographic, as it’s known, is huge -- estimated to comprise more than a quarter of all U.S. households -- and its need for financing is acute, especially during tough times.

So the industry has created a slew of pricey specialty loan products that were designed for lower-income borrowers with poor credit. I’m talking about payday, bill-pay and refund anticipation loans, insurance-premium financing, structured settlement and private student loans.

But are the risks associated with these credit products truly so great that they justify the outsized rewards the lending institutions earn for marketing them? Let’s take a behind-the-scenes look at how these financings are structured and you can decide for yourself.

Many companies pay their employees in arrears -- this week’s paycheck is based on the previous week’s hours. They’re also likely to pay every other week or twice-monthly. So it’s not unusual for a low-income earner to feel the pinch in between payrolls, hence the creation of the payday or account advance loan.

As long as the borrower’s employer is a bona fide company that can confirm its employee’s continuing earning status, and as long as the payday lender is able to gain control over its borrower’s next payroll deposit, the lender will have effectively ensured the repayment of its loan. The borrower, however, might not fare so well. That’s because the cash-flow “hole” he’s created for himself by trading next week’s paycheck for this week’s cash is likely to provoke a recurring need; at least until he’s able to generate enough extra cash-flow to bridge the gap on his own. In fact, according to a report by the Center for Responsible Lending, the typical payday borrower remains indebted for two or more years for a loan that was intended to span one or two weeks.

And the reward for what turns out to be a very tightly-managed risk? The typical account advance lender loan charges more than 600% APR (annual percentage rate) for the service.

Consumers who live from paycheck to paycheck often run short. However, as long as the borrower’s checking account activity is consistent -- predictable payroll deposits every other week, comparable-dollar utility, cable and cellphone payments every month -- and as long as the borrower agrees to a preauthorized Automated Clearing House from that checking account, the bill-pay lender will then have virtually managed away its risk when it covers one of the borrower’s monthly cellphone payments.

The bill-pay lender’s reward? When you combine the processing fees and interest, the APRs can approach 200%.

Payroll tax over-withholding is not uncommon for low-income earners (and others) who may lack the financial literacy education that would help them to understand the math behind the process. Consequently, those who live with unforgiving budgets may be strongly tempted to take advantage of the quick cash-hit a tax refund advance represents.

From the lender’s perspective, as long as the tax return was properly prepared and filed, and provided that it can secure the refund once it’s been issued, it’ll have effectively offset the risk of nonpayment by swapping the credit of the low-income borrower for that of the U.S. Treasury -- the issuer of the tax-refund check.

The refund lender’s reward? According to the National Consumer Law Center, the APRs for these loans range from 100% to 200%.

Auto insurance premiums can be expensive, especially for those living in major urban areas. And while many insurance carriers offer payment plans for their policy premiums, some don’t. Enter the insurance-premium finance companies. The loans are typically structured with a down payment that’s at least equal to the non-refundable portion of the total annual premium: the up-front money the insurer gets to keep even if the policy is canceled right away.

The balance is then spread out over fewer months than the policy is designed to cover. That way, in the event of a payment default, the lender is able to cancel the policy before the remainder of the premium has been “earned” by the insurance carrier and pay itself back with the refund. As a result, the risk is once again very tightly managed, if not completely eliminated.

In return, the borrower pays an interest rate that’s usually much lower than for payday, bill-pay or refund anticipation loans, which seems like a pretty good deal -- that is, as long as the payments are made on time with checks or ACH drafts that are backed up with sufficient funds on deposit. Otherwise, the high fees the finance companies charge for late payments and bounced checks can easily escalate the overall cost for these nine or 10-month loans to the mid-double digits or more.

Hardly a day goes by without a structured settlement loan commercial that features a campy mini-opera or a little dog planting a money tree. The pitch is, you’re entitled to a future stream of payments -- whether from a court settlement, annuity or some other source -- but you need the money now. High risk? Not so much. That’s because the lending decision has less to do with the borrower’s creditworthiness than it does with the entity that has agreed to remit the payments in the first place.

The reward? According to a transaction sampling published by the Bankruptcy Law Network, APRs can approach the mid-double digits.

Generally speaking, students who borrow for their education don’t have payroll checks, tax refunds, prepaid insurance premiums or structured settlements to pledge as collateral in exchange for the money they need. As such, you’d probably conclude that student loans are actually the riskiest of this group of loans, right? Well, yes, unless you consider that except in extreme circumstances (as measured by the Brunner test), these loans are virtually impossible to discharge in bankruptcy. So the question becomes, what’s a fair price to charge for a loan that sticks to your personal credit like gum to the bottom of a sneaker?

According to the government, it’s 3.4% if you can demonstrate financial hardship and 6.8% otherwise. The private lenders, however, feel differently. I do a fair amount of pro bono counseling work at the university where I teach, and the students and alums I help are struggling with private student loan debts that carry interest rates as high as 15%. To give you a sense of the impact this kind of rate differential can have, borrowing $10,000 at 15% for 10 years is the same as borrowing $16,400 at 3.4% for same duration. Is it any wonder why more and more students are moving into their parents’ basements after graduating college?

Face it, the financial services industry isn’t likely to reform or discontinue these high-priced lending products on its own -- there’s just too much money at stake. Therefore, it’s up to those who need these specialty loan products to learn how to avoid the worst of the deals and limit the damage from the ones they end up selecting. A few suggestions:

Payday loans and bill-pay loans are not only very expensive but they also have the very real potential of becoming the kind of debt traps I described before. You’re actually better off taking a credit card cash-advance, even if it comes with a 25% interest rate plus a 5% fee (which is what my own credit card company charges). The APR calculates to a little less than 35%, if the loan were to be paid off in 12 months -- far less than for either of the alternatives. This simple APR calculator, courtesy of Efunda.com, can help with the math.Insurance-premium financing can make sense if you’re careful about not missing a payment or bouncing a check. Otherwise, the fees will eat you up alive. If you’re obtaining your insurance coverage through an intermediary (insurance agent or broker), double check that the carrier doesn’t offer a less costly service of its own.

Structured settlement loans can also make sense provided that the interest rate is low enough, you’re prepared to live without the monthly payments you would have otherwise received and you’re disciplined enough not to fritter away the cash once you get your hands on it. Online calculators such as this one, courtesy of Zenweaan, help you decide.When it comes to financing higher education, try to limit your borrowing to the programs the government has made available to students and parents. In addition to lower rates of interest, the feds also offer the most repayment flexibility -- which is particularly important in times of economic difficulty.

Sunday, April 20

The least expensive 2014 cars to insure

The least expensive 2014 cars to insure
Business Week | By Jeffrey Steele, Insure.com

Most of the cheapest cars to insure aren't actually cars, they're SUVs and minivans.

If you want to save money on auto insurance, spring for an SUV or minivan. Insure.com's annual ranking of the vehicles with the best car insurance rates is dominated by non-sedans.

A few years ago, minivans held a good grip on our "least expensive to insure" rankings. But small and mid-size SUVs have been increasingly grabbing ranking spots. This year, minivans account for just five of the top 20 places. (See the 2014 rankings for the most expensive cars to insure and car insurance rates by state.)

And Jeep grabs a remarkable seven of the 20 "least expensive to insure" spots.

The advantages that propelled the minivans to the best spots are now being seen with SUVs: Family-friendly vehicles used mainly for safely ferrying kids around to Scout meetings and soccer matches. The parent driving the kids is among the least likely to speed, crash or have a claim.

And good rates always boil down to claims: When drivers of a certain vehicle submit fewer claims and/or less expensive claims, all owners that vehicle benefit with better car insurance rates.

That brings us to the Jeep Wrangler, Patriot, Compass and Grand Cherokee. Their good insurance rates hinge on Jeep owners.

While Jeeps exude an "adventurous spirit," they're usually not used for reckless abandon.

Least expensive 2014 cars to insure

6. Chrysler Town & Country Touring

According to Karl Brauer, senior analyst for Irvine, Calif.-based Kelley Blue Book, owners of Jeeps tend to be single or married women under age 45, who display prudent driving behavior.

"While there is an 'adventuresome' image to the Jeep brand, for every Wrangler that does serious off-roading, there are dozens of Wranglers and Grand Cherokees and Compasses -- and CR-Vs, Siennas and Traverses -- that are used to carefully haul kids around suburbia at sub-50-mph speeds most of the time," he says. "This demographic and these driving conditions don't cause a lot of accidents, thankfully."

While advertising may show Jeeps on craggy rocks, it's not unusual for Jeeps to never go off-roading.

Mark Takahashi, auto editor for Edmunds.com in Santa Monica, Calif., agrees that most Jeeps are regarded as family vehicles. "If you're driving your family around, you will drive more carefully, and not take chances, because you have a vested interest in being a careful driver," he says.

Jeep Wranglers in particular are very economical to repair, which helps keep insurance rates down. If you get a dent in your door, the body shop can easily remove the door.

"It's usually bolted rather than welded together. Look at the doors of a Jeep Wrangler to this day, and they're removable, just like the old Army Jeeps," says Takahashi.

Joe Wiesenfelder, executive editor of Chicago-based Cars.com, agrees Jeep's victory on the "least expensive to insure" rankings is a reflection of both how safely Jeep owners drive their vehicles and the cost of repair and replacement of Jeeps.

"You'd certainly be able to theorize that the owners of any one on this list are less likely to have collisions, and that the vehicles are less likely to be stolen. If they're low-volume cars, that suggests less of a replacement part market" for stolen parts.

Jeeps and SUVs also likely have an advantage because of their height. "They are higher-riding than the average car," Wiesenfelder says. "So if they are in a collision with an average car, that car will have greater damage than the Jeep."

Insure.com commissioned Quadrant Information Services to provide average auto insurance rates for 2014 models. Averages were calculated using data from six large carriers (Allstate, Farmers, GEICO, Nationwide, Progressive and State Farm) in 10 ZIP codes per state. Not all models were available, especially exotic cars. More than 850 models are included in the 2014 study.

Averages are based on full coverage for a single 40-year-old male who commutes 12 miles to work each day, with policy limits of 100/300/50 ($100,000 for injury liability for one person, $300,000 for all injuries and $50,000 for property damage in an accident) and a $500 deductible on collision and comprehensive coverage. This hypothetical driver has a clean record and good credit. The rate includes uninsured motorist coverage. Average rates are for comparative purposes. Your own rate will depend on personal factors.

Tuesday, April 15

5 do-good ETFs that beat the market

5 do-good ETFs that beat the market
Business Week | By Aaron Levitt, InvestorPlace

Want to invest with a clear conscience? Socially responsible funds no longer have to sacrifice profits to take the moral high ground.

In a growing trend, many investors are now building portfolios based in part on their morals and values. Dubbed "socially responsible investing," or SRI, these investors essentially add several screens to shift through various stocks in order to comply with various environmental, social and governance (ESG) requirements.

The hope is that the underlying SRI portfolio will produce a strong financial return as well as a good social one. And those returns have been getting much, much better.

Socially responsible investing used to be considered the whipping boy in terms of total returns, often falling behind broad indexes and "sin" related industries like tobacco, booze and gambling. However, with major pensions and sovereign wealth funds now using their immense size to influence management on ESG policies, SRI returns have improved.

According to Goldman Sachs (GS), firms that are considered to be leaders in socially responsible investing have also been leaders in terms of stock performance as well -- averaging an extra 25 percent over the longer term. This echoes similar research conducted by Allianz. Between 2006 and 2010, the German insurance group found that investors could have added an additional 1.6 percent a year to their investment returns by allocating to portfolios that invest in companies with above-average ESG ratings.

The bottom line is that investors no longer have to sacrifice their morals when looking for investment returns. Here are five of the easiest ways to make your portfolio a little more socially responsible.

The iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social (DSI) ETF should be the first stop for any investor looking to add a dash of social responsibility to their portfolio.

The ETF's underlying index tracks 99 percent of all the stocks in the United States. That includes large- mid- and small-cap firms. First, index provider MSCI kicks out all tobacco, gambling, firearms/weapons, nuclear power, adult entertainment and GMO seed producers in the USA Investable Market Index. It then uses various socially responsible investing screens to weight DSI's holdings and create its underlying portfolio.

The SRI ETF currently tracks 400 different firms and charges just 0.50 percent -- or $50 per $10,000 -- in expenses.

And while the removal of those various "sin" industries may at first blush seem like a drag on DSI's performance, it has actually been the opposite. The socially responsible investment managed to post a 35.5 percent return in 2013 -- besting the venerable S&P 500 ($INX). Over the last five years, that outperformance continues.

For investors who want to eliminate the volatility of owning smaller firms from their portfolios, the iShares MSCI USA ESG Select ETF (KLD) is a solid choice.

The $250 million KLD tracks U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks screened for positive socially responsible investing characteristics and excludes tobacco companies. Index provider MSCI first looks at its broad MSCI USA index -- which contains about 250 stocks. The indexer then applies a standard set of criteria to weight each stock, and those with stronger weights get more prominent placement in the new SRI index. That produces a portfolio of 107 different stocks -- with top holdings in Apple (AAPL) and renewable energy-focused utility NextEra Energy (NEE).

Overall, technology and financial firms make up the bulk of KLD's holdings.

Returns for the socially responsible investing fund have been pretty strong. KLD managed to post a nearly 31 percent total return in 2013. While that slightly underperformed the broader S&P 500 ($INX), KLD has beaten the benchmark index over the past five years. Like its sister fund DSI, expenses for KLD run just 0.50 percent.

While most social responsible managers tend to focus on a variety of ESG screens, a common theme is environmental issues and how firms react to the concept of sustainability. The often ignored Huntington EcoLogical Strategy ETF (HECO) taps into the various firms making efforts on this front.

However, this is not an ETF of solar and wind power producers.

Sponsor Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) defines "ecologically focused companies" as firms that have positioned their businesses to respond to increased environmental legislation, cultural shifts toward environmentally conscious consumption and capital investments in environmentally oriented projects.

The actively managed fund picks out what the managers believe are the best targets in the previously mentioned MSCI KLD 400 Social Index. Currently, the fund holds 56 different firms including Starbucks (SBUX) and chipmaker Texas Instruments (TXN).

That active focus has produced some hefty returns as well. HECO managed to return nearly 30 percent in 2013 and is up nearly 4 percent year-to-date. Expenses for the ETF are bit on the high side, however, currently at 0.95 percent.

While the previous three SRI ETFs track big passive indexes, AdvisorShares Global Echo ETF (GIVE) is a little bit different.

The fund is actively managed as a "core" solution, meaning it holds both stocks as well as fixed income instruments and bonds. All of these holdings are scrutinized for various socially responsible investing and ESG requirements before being added to GIVE's underlying portfolio. However, since it is actively managed, these holdings can and do change on a daily basis. The ETF also holds a nearly 4.2 percent weighting in the previously mentioned DSI ETF.

Here's where GIVE gets interesting.

The ETF charges a monster 1.61 percent in expenses. However, 0.40 percent of that is donated to Philippe Cousteau Jr.'s -- Jacques Cousteau's grandson -- Global Echo Foundation. The foundation's mission is to provide funding solutions "to many of the challenges facing the world community from social issues impacting women and children to environmental conservation."

Unfortunately, that hasn't done much to bring investors to the fund, as GIVE has only attracted around $9 million in assets so far – possibly because investors in the ETF don't actually get to claim a tax deduction from the donation.

The newest entrant into the socially responsible investing world is the ALPS Workplace Equality ETF (EQLT).

The premise of EQLT is to focus on "America's leading equality-minded corporations," meaning EQLT will track those firms that provide support and benefits to their lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) employees.

EQLT uses the Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality Index and only selects stocks that score 100 percent in the metric. The metric basically looks at a company's hiring practices and whether or not it provides healthcare and other benefits to same-sex partners or spouses. Currently, EQLT has around 162 different holdings.

However, the kicker for EQLT is that many of its holdings -- like spirits maker Brown-Forman (BF.B) or casino operator Caesars (CZR) -- aren't necessarily typical ESG fair. That could turn off some investors looking at EQLT for socially responsible investing. Another potential problem for the new fund is its hefty 0.75 percent expense ratio.

The space is still pretty new, so the choices are a bit limited, but if you're interested in socially responsible investing, these funds are your best bets.

As of this writing, Aaron Levitt did not hold a position in any of the aforementioned securities.

Saturday, April 12

7 ways your 401k is improving

7 ways your 401k is improving
Business Week | By Jennie L. Phipps, Bankrate.com

Will 401k's become American retirees' savings plan of choice? Here's how they're evolving to fit the times.

People retiring in 20 or more years are going to be the first recent generation to retire relying mostly on their own savings from 401ks and the like.

Whether this approach is good enough to provide a comfortable retirement for most people remains to be seen, but Jeanne Thompson, a vice president at Fidelity Investments, the nation's largest provider of these retirement savings plans, is optimistic. She says, "The Pension Protection Act of 2006 was a sweeping reform that put in place guardrails to strengthen 401ks. All of the nuts and bolts are there to give 401ks the durability to become the primary savings vehicle."

The system is still evolving. Thompson points to these retirement planning industry trends that aim to further strengthen 401ks:

More Roth 401ks. About twice as many plans compared with 2009 -- about 42 percent -- have added Roth options. These allow participants to pay taxes on the money as it goes in rather than when it comes out. Thompson says they are especially attractive for younger workers who are in the early years of their careers and not making big salaries or facing big tax liabilities. Paying taxes at this point allows workers to build a bigger, more secure retirement savings base and manage the risk of higher future tax rates.

Greater availability of self-directed brokerage options. More employers -- about 40 percent -- are giving workers who are experienced investors the option of using the broad array of stocks, bonds and mutual funds available outside of their 401k plan lineups. Thompson says this option is particularly attractive to older investors with more money to manage.

More employees enrolled automatically. At companies with 401k auto enrollment, on average 84 percent of workers participate compared with slightly more than 50 percent when enrollment isn't automatic. "Inertia takes over," Thompson says.

Ways to compare plan features. More employers are demanding industry-specific benchmarking information from their 401k providers and some of them are sharing that info with their employee participants. If you're not getting this information, ask your human resources department because it may be available.

More high-deductible health plans with health savings accounts, or HSAs. Thompson says more employers are offering this option to hold down insurance costs, and it's particularly attractive to younger, healthier workers, as well as older workers saving to cover health care costs in retirement. "Many people are over insured," Thompson says. "They pay $300 to $400 a month for insurance, but they only go to the doctor once a year. If they choose a high-deductible plan, they pay less per month and they can put the difference in an HSA where there is triple tax savings -- money goes in tax free; it earns tax-fee interest, and it goes out tax-free."

More savers choosing target-date funds. Many employers are making target-date funds the default option, and 33 percent of workers are either going with the flow or deliberately choosing this option. A smaller percentage of employees have a personally managed option, which provides a very specific array of investments based on information the worker provides about his personal financial situation. On average, workers who use the managed option pay an additional 50 basis points (half a percent) in annual fees.

More focus on the bottom line. Increasingly employers are making available tools that help workers translate savings into projected monthly income streams in retirement. If your employer isn't, then ask. This is an inexpensive benefit that can make your retirement planning much more effective.

Thursday, April 3

The military gateway to the middle class is vanishing

The military gateway to the middle class is vanishing
For many Americans, earning a college degree and buying a house are considered milestones on the path toward a middle-class life. For Ted White, a licensed mental health therapist and proud homeowner, neither of those steps would have been easy, or perhaps even possible, without a career in the Army.

White, 37, grew up in a working class household in Nebraska. He took advantage of the GI bill and the Army College Fund to jumpstart his civilian career after serving in the military in Germany and California from 1994 through 1998. He also credits his military service for enabling him to buy a house in La Vista, Nebraska, where he lives today with his wife and two daughters.

“The VA home loan has helped a lot,” White told The Fiscal Times, referring to a program administered by the Veterans Administration that guarantees a portion of mortgages. “That’s probably one of the biggest benefits since getting out, after the college money.”

White followed a time-honored glide path from humble beginnings to the middle class by enlisting in the military. For generations dating back to World War II, the military has provided unique opportunities to young people to see the world and develop skills and talents that proved to be highly marketable when they left the service.

“Unquestionably the military – and particularly the Army – provided a pathway out of poverty and a hardscrabble life for young people who were drafted against their will and also for young people who volunteered,” said Hugh B. Price, a former president of the National Urban League and author who has studied the socio-economic impact of military service.

“I know this from personal experience when I was growing up in Washington, D.C.,” said Price, who is in his early 70s. “It’s true of young people coming out of inner cities as well as young people living in rural areas across the country.”

Those lifelong benefits will no longer be available to thousands of young Americans if the Obama administration makes good on its plans to sharply cut the Pentagon’s budget. The Defense Department last month proposed shrinking Army troop levels over the next few years to the lowest since World War II.

The current force of 520,000 would be reduced to between 440,000 and 450,000. If across the board cuts under sequestration were subsequently restored, the Army would shrink to 420,000, according to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel.

In addition to raising concerns about military readiness, the move could impede economic and social mobility for thousands of young men and women at a time when President Obama has vowed to strengthen anti-poverty programs and try to close the gap between the very rich and very poor.

Jay Teachman, a sociology professor at Western Washington University, said research shows that thousands of Americans, particularly those with low incomes, reap the financial benefits from a career in the Army, so long as they receive an honorable discharge.

“Even if they don’t earn more education, they certainly earn more money,” said Teachman, who looked at the relationship between military service and income between 1979 and 2002. “They’re plucked out of communities where they might not have had the same opportunities.”

The GI Bill, introduced and signed into law in 1944, has provided those opportunities to millions of veterans by giving them the financial means to earn a college degree. The program’s popularity peaked shortly after the end of World War II, with vets accounting for 49 percent of college admissions in 1947, according to government figures. The home loan program also got its start in 1944. Many older Army vets also cite their military service as a momentum-builder for later success in the civilian world.

“Almost everything I own or do has to do with military money one way or another,” said Richard Constant, 71, a Vietnam War vet who used the GI Bill to earn an M.B.A. from Fairleigh Dickinson University. Getting that advanced degree, he said, boosted his earning potential, starting with his first job in the insurance field.

“When I was out of the Army I got a job with New York Life,” said Constant, who is retired and lives in Framingham, Massachusetts. “The guy offered me $18,000 a year, and then he sort of looked down and said, ‘Wow, you have a masters. Make that $21,000.’”

Money isn’t the only benefit earned from military service. For many who grew up without a strong family structure, the army provides discipline, training and teamwork – skills and behaviors that are highly valued in the workplace. Veterans have unique strengths, which are highly prized according to military job placement experts. They’re loyal, have a reliable work ethic, are self-disciplined and productive, and have good communication skills. (Many are technologically literate, an advantage in any company.)

Experts caution, however, that the notion of the military as an easy pathway to the middle class can be exaggerated. For example, bitter controversies over the draft and the justification for U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, Operation Desert Storm, and the Iraq and Afghanistan wars left many veterans persona non grata in the market place.

Michael E. O’Hanlon, a defense and foreign policy expert with the Brookings Institution, notes that the size of today’s military relative to the overall population of young adults is much smaller than it was back in the 1950s and early 1960s.

“So if [the military] is a jobs or training program it’s only affecting five percent of the relative demographic, whereas back in the Eisenhower days it might have been more than 20 percent,” O’Hanlon said. “In terms of the broad story that’s an important point to bear in mind.”

Moreover, many of the veterans who returned from wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had problems finding work because of serious wounds or mental problems. Some veterans groups complained that employers were discriminating against veterans – fearing that they would be taking on potential problems. Unemployment among the post-9/11 era veterans was 7.9 percent in January, well above the national average of 6.6 percent and higher than the overall unemployment rate among veterans of 5.6 percent, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

A 2003 University of California-Berkeley doctoral thesis by Catherine N. Barry explored the question of whether the children of immigrants who served in the U.S. military benefited from a later-life trajectory in their education and earnings.

“An empirical investigation of post-military educational and labor market outcomes reveal that military service does not uniformly benefit veteran children of immigrants as they may have hoped,” Barry wrote.

Data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Youth and other research shows that veteran children of immigrants are less likely to acquire bachelor degrees and are less likely to be enrolled in post-secondary schools than non-veterans by the ages of 24 to 32, Barry reported. But unemployment and earnings are similar between veteran and non-veteran children of immigrants.

Other experts saw the value of military service in getting ahead. The benefits of military service on future job prospects are supported by research from Charles Moskos who was dubbed the “dean of military sociologists” before his death in 2008. Moskos, who was a professor at Northwestern University, noted that rising military pay helped make the armed services competitive with some civilian jobs, promoting more of a professional atmosphere.

The reductions in troop levels proposed by Hagel and the administration will mean lower-income Americans are unlikely to make the leap to the middle class, according to Teachman of Western Washington University. “Their unemployment rates are going to be much higher,” he said. “They’re going to filling lower-income occupations.”

“I can’t see a good Plan B for these people,” he added. “They’re going to get left behind.”

Wednesday, March 19

Cheapest ways to insure teen drivers

Cheapest ways to insure teen drivers
Business Week | By Nancy Dunham, CarInsurance.com

No words can spook parents like 'your teen is getting a driver's license.' Here's how to keep insurance costs to a minimum.

Expect to pay a hefty sum to insure your teen driver.

Adding a teen driver to your car insurance policy can boost rates by 20 percent to almost 200 percent, depending on variables that include the state in which you live, the car the teen drives, his or her student status and, of course, your insurer's rules.

So should you just buy your teen driver a bus pass and let it go?

"The downside to not letting your teen drive at all is that they may rebel against you and also endure teasing from friends," says David Bakke of personal finance advisers Money Crashers, based in Atlanta.

Your tolerance for heavy sighs may help determine what you and your teen do next.

Wait. Any brand-new driver – even if he or she is 40 -- will pay more for car insurance, usually for the first three years of licensure. But a teenager also pays for being young, and the price is steep. A 16-year-old may face a surcharge as much as 100 percent. That youth surcharge goes down a bit every year, so a driver newly licensed at 18 will pay less than at 16. (See "What young drivers need to know.")

Hang on to the permit. "Instead of preventing (teens) from driving, consider having them keep their drivers' permits for a longer period of time,” Bakke suggests. Some car insurance companies don’t include the teenager in rate calculations until the new driver is fully licensed. Others do – so ask.

If your teen drives the car alone and wrecks it, you probably will be covered – and then charged premiums as if the teenager were licensed now that the child is driving alone, says CarInsurance.com consumer analyst Penny Gusner.

It’s not like they can’t use the practice with you or another adult, licensed driver in the car. Per mile driven, teen drivers ages 16 to 19 are three times more likely than drivers age 20 and older to be in a fatal crash, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

License the teen, but don’t let him or her drive your car. It’s called a named driver exclusion, and it means the insurance company won’t consider the teen when it calculates your rates. But you are agreeing that the child won’t drive your car – and the insurance company will not pay for the damages if he or she wrecks it.

“Not every company may allow the practice,” says Gusner. “And those that do may want to charge you a fee or surcharge for doing so.”

Snag that 'good student' discount. Depending on the company and your state, a good student discount can save you as much as 20 percent, says Dan Young, spokesperson for auto-body repair experts CARSTAR and a 20-year veteran of Allstate Insurance.

In most states, a good student discount is among the biggest money-savers you’ll find, decreasing a typical full-coverage bill by an average of 12 percent, according to data gathered for CarInsurance.com by Quadrant Information Services. In some states, such as Illinois and Minnesota, the average good student discount was nearly 18 percent.

Virtually every carrier offers a good student discount; the usual qualifiers may include full-time enrollment in high school or college, average grades of at least a "B," Dean's List status, or a ranking in the top 20 percent of his or her/class. Often the discounts carry over even after the student has left school, up to a certain age.

Consider a driver safety course. Taking and passing these courses, routinely offered at area high schools, state motor vehicle departments, and elsewhere, generally qualify the teen for additional insurance discounts. The discounts cut a typical full-coverage bill by about 2.4 percent, according to the Quadrant data, but the discount was twice that amount in many states and not available at all in others.

Stay accident-free and ticket-free. You don’t want to be on the wrong side of an accident claim with a teenager on the policy. Insurance companies also can levy surcharges after accidents or major traffic violations. With a teenager on the policy, that surcharge gets multiplied again.

Let’s say your $100-a-month liability car insurance bill doubled when you added your teenager to the policy. Then you have an accident, triggering a claims surcharge of 25 percent.

On a policy by yourself, your bill would rise to $125. With the teen, it goes to $250.

Read More: Bad credit? These cards can help

To really keep your rates low, do all you can to prevent your teen from becoming involved in an accident. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) released a report showing that teens whose parents set rules and were engaged with their teen drivers were 50 percent less likely to become involved in a crash.

"As parents, the ultimate goal when our kids start driving is to ensure their safety and the safety of others. That starts with establishing expectations," says Jim Donelon, president of the NAIC and Louisiana insurance commissioner. "The good news is that by setting boundaries, we are making the roads safer for everyone."

Review your policy. If your teen leaves for college and won't drive your car, you may want to see if your insurer will temporarily remove him or her from your policy.

But, cautions Jim Sutton, president of James F. Sutton Agency in East Islip, N.Y., "you need to be sure the car is definitely home and not away with the student. After a period of at least six months, the young driver can elect to purchase his or her own policy with your policy or go out and get his or her own coverage without having the 'inexperienced operator' surcharge applied." Of course, the length of time varies depending on the insurer.

Lastly, no two insurance companies calculate your rates the same way. If there were ever a time to compare car insurance rates, now is it.

Friday, March 14

Bad credit? These cards can help

Bad credit? These cards can help
Business Week | By Peter Andrew, IndexCreditCards.com

If your credit scores are circling the drain, one of these credit cards could help you get back on track.

You might be surprised by how many Americans get by with few or no mainstream financial services.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation reported in 2012 that 28.3 percent of U.S. households were either "unbanked" (didn't have so much as a checking or savings account), or "underbanked" (had at least one such account, but had still, in the previous 12 months, used alternative financial services, such as check-cashing companies or payday lenders).

It wasn't so long ago that not having a credit card was likely to seriously cramp your style. Without one, you couldn't make online transactions, book flights, rent cars, reserve hotel rooms and so on. But things have changed. Prepaid and debit cards now make it much easier to do most of those things.

So is there any point in having credit cards anymore? You bet!

This website is always talking about the unique consumer benefits and protections credit cards bring, but they also have an additional role for those whose credit reports have been damaged. Neither debit cards nor prepaid ones routinely report your financial activity to credit bureaus, which means they have zero impact on your credit score. Credit cards, however, do make such reports, and that means they can be one of the fastest and surest ways of boosting that score.

The problem is, if your score is low, you're likely to struggle to get approved for mainstream plastic. Luckily, there are two types of credit card designed for people in precisely that position:

Secured credit cards: These require you to lodge an upfront deposit, and you generally spend and replenish that. So it's hard to get further in debt, good behavior should boost your credit score, and you stand to get an ordinary, unsecured credit card once you've proved your finances are back on track.Unsecured credit cards for bad credit: These don't require an upfront deposit, but the issuers tend to cover the additional risk you pose with higher credit card rates, and, usually, annual fees.

You need to take care in committing to any financial product, and these are no exception. In fact, given that you're currently in a vulnerable situation, you should take even more care when applying for one of these cards. In particular:

Reporting to credit bureaus cuts both ways. It's a great opportunity to prove you have the resources and skills to manage your money well, and can quickly increase your score. But it can just as quickly make things worse if you mess up. Be certain you're going to have the cash and self discipline to act perfectly. A good way is to draw up a household budget in advance. Be prepared for rejection. If your financial history is messy enough, you may not qualify even for one of these products. If your application's declined, you could consider applying for a store card, some of which have low approval thresholds. But be aware of the dangers of these. Wherever people are desperate, there are sharks waiting to prey on them. Some card issuers offering these products are notoriously predatory, and charge outrageous fees (including especially dangerous "application fees") and usurious rates. Be sure you read and understand the terms and conditions in full before you commit to anything.
One of the best issuers of secured credit cards is First Progress, and it's worth exploring further three of its products in particular:

First Progress Platinum Select MasterCard® Secured Credit CardFirst Progress Platinum Elite MasterCard® Secured Credit CardFirst Progress Platinum Prestige Secured MasterCard®
Read the terms and conditions of all three for yourself to find the one that suits you best, but let's take a closer look at the main features of the last one, just as an example:

You have to maintain a minimum security deposit of $300, although you can decide to deposit up to $2,000.You won't get interest on that sum, but you will be charged interest at 11.99 percent APR variable on purchases (more on other transactions), which is very reasonable by comparison with average credit card rates. However, you don't get an interest-free grace period, and should begin to pay from the day a transaction is posted on your account.There's an annual fee of $44.These cards are not yet available to residents of Arkansas, Iowa, New York or Wisconsin. First Progress reports on accounts to all three credit bureaus each month.

With unsecured credit cards, you don't have to pay a security deposit, but the cards can be costly. Again, the advantage is that your accounts should be reported each month to credit bureaus, so giving you the chance to rebuild your score quickly.

Barclaycard Rewards MasterCard - average credit: This isn't for those with really bad credit, but it's a great deal for anyone who's just below the threshold for mainstream cards. There's no annual fee, but the rate is a high 24.99 percent APR. This is, of course, irrelevant, providing you completely pay your balance each month. You can get double rewards points on gas and groceries purchases and utilities payments.Credit One Bank Credit Card with Gas Rewards - poor credit: You're more likely to get approved for this than the Barclaycard product, but it comes with a $75 annual fee in the first year, and $99 annual fees each year thereafter. The rate charged is a steep 23.90 percent APR, but you can get basic rewards on gas purchases. One advantage is a pre-qualification process that lets you apply without affecting your credit score.

You wouldn't go anywhere near any of this plastic -- except, maybe, the Barclaycard product -- in normal circumstances, but these are difficult times. The sooner you can get your score back up, the sooner you can apply for mainstream cards and lose all the problems bad credit brings.

These products are good for that. However, if you do apply for one, just make sure you really are going to be able to make payments on time, and, if at all possible, pay down your balance in full each month. If you can't be certain of that, it may be best to wait until you are.

Sunday, March 9

11 little-known car insurance discounts

11 little-known car insurance discounts
Business Week | By Catey Hill, MarketWatch

This list could save some drivers hundreds of dollars a year.

Drivers with short commutes, who own their home or who don’t drive every day of the week are among the many consumers eligible to save hundreds of dollars each year on car insurance. Not that they necessarily know it.

The average American spends $762 per year on car insurance, according to a Bankrate.com survey. Depending on where you live, you’re more—or less—likely to score big discounts. Missouri residents get the most discounts (discounts are available about 33.1 percent of the time), followed by Connecticut (32.6 percent), Indiana (32.3 percent), Wisconsin (32.1 percent) and Iowa (31.7 percent), according to a survey released recently by Insure.com.

Meanwhile, residents of North Carolina tend to get the fewest discounts (discounts are available about 13.2 percent of the time), followed by Hawaii (14.5 percent), New York (20.3 percent), Massachusetts (20.5 percent) and Michigan (20.9 percent).

While it’s hard to pick up and move, the good news is that you can score car insurance discounts no matter where you live. The most common discounts—and the ones that most of us have heard about—include those for being a good student (77 percent of the insurance carriers surveyed by Insure.com offered this with an average 16 percent discount), having a home policy with the same company (68 percent offered this with a 9 percent discount), paying all of most of the bill upfront (46 percent offered this with a 9 percent discount), being married (41 percent offered this with a 14 percent discount) and taking a driver training course (41 percent offered this with a 7 percent average discount), the Insure.com survey revealed.

But there are many more discounts that, though less common, still can produce significant savings if you can get them.

“The right discount can knock hundreds of dollars off your car insurance bill,” says Insure.com editorial director Amy Danise. But many discounts aren’t advertised or automatically offered: “Often you just have to ask to start saving some money,” advises certified financial planner Joel Ohman, founder of CarInsuranceComparison.com. Danise says you should call and ask about specific discounts when you are looking for a new policy, and if you already have one, you should ask annually. People should also ask about discounts after a major life event like a divorce or a shortened work commute.

Here are 11 little-known discounts—and what they can save the average consumer.

Consumers who drive less—typically 7,000, 10,000 and 12,500 miles per year -- may be eligible for discounts (13 percent of companies surveyed offer this discount and the average savings was 11 percent, according to the Insure.com data). That means that the average customer (who spends $762 per year on car insurance, according to Bankrate.com) who scored this discount would save an average of nearly $84 per year.

People who use their car primarily for farming (someone who mainly drives his truck around the farm, for example)—as opposed to business or pleasure—will get the steepest discounts, says Danise. Roughly 40 percent of surveyed companies offered this discount with an average savings of 10 percent.

More than one in four insurance companies offers a discount to those who renew in advance, typically seven to 10 days ahead of schedule. The savings is significant—8 percent on average—which would save the average consumer nearly $61 per year.

“The industry rewards loyalty,” says Danise. In particular, companies tend to give discounts for consumers who have been customers for a year, 36 months and/or 60 months. More than one in three insurance companies surveyed offered this discount and the average savings was 6 percent.

People who own their own homes, condos or apartments can save an average of 6 percent off car insurance. Fully 21 percent of insurance companies offer this deal.

While most people know that they can get an auto insurance discount by holding a homeowner’s insurance policy with the same company, the bundling also works with life insurance. The discount in this case is usually 4 percent—and roughly 37 percent of surveyed companies offered it—which would save the average person more than $30 per year.

Because companies want to get paid in full and on time, many offer a discount to drivers who allow companies to automatically deduct payments from their bank accounts. More than one in three insurance companies surveyed offered this discount and the average consumer would save 4 percent by opting for this option.

People who commute to work for shorter distances—typically five, 10 or 15 or fewer miles—can often save money, says Danise. Fully 22 percent of surveyed insurance companies offered this discount and the average savings was 4 percent.

Eight percent of companies offer a discount for people who don’t drive every day. Typically, the discount is for those who drive one, two, three or four days per week, says Danise. The average savings is 4 percent.

People who own rather than lease their car may be able to save: Roughly 7 percent of companies offer this and the average discount is 4 percent.

Only 6 percent of companies offer this discount—some for getting a bachelor’s, master’s or Ph.D. and occasionally for completion of vocational or technical school. The average savings is 4 percent.

Friday, March 7

The hidden costs of Medicare

The hidden costs of Medicare
Business Week | By Emily Brandon, U.S. News & World Report

Watch out for these unexpected Medicare costs.

Some of the out-of-pocket costs Medicare beneficiaries face are fairly predictable, such as their monthly premiums, annual deductible and the copays and coinsurance associated with various Medicare services. However, there are other Medicare costs that are far more difficult to discern that could lead to surprise medical bills in retirement. Here are some Medicare costs you might unexpectedly incur in retirement:

During the first 12 months you have Medicare Part B, you can get a free “Welcome to Medicare” preventive care doctor’s visit, and after that retirees are eligible for a free annual wellness checkup. However, depending on what tests or services your doctor orders during this visit, you may still end up with a bill. While Medicare covers a variety of preventive care services with no cost-sharing requirements, if your doctor recommends a test or procedure that isn’t considered preventive or you get a test more often than Medicare covers it, you may have to pay coinsurance and the Part B deductible may apply.

“If the doctor orders a test and it falls under Part B, you could very well have to pay 20 percent of those test costs,” says Allison Hoffman, an assistant professor of law at the UCLA School of Law. However, supplemental plans such as Medigap and Medicare Advantage plans may fill in some of these cost-sharing requirements.

Medicare covers many, but not all, preventive care screenings with no out-of-pocket costs for retirees. However, if a screening test finds something concerning that requires additional tests or services, you will likely face a variety of out-of-pocket costs.

“The copay is reduced to zero for the preventive service, but once that part of the service is no longer preventive, now we are treating something and you are going to hit the 20 percent copay,” says Jack Hoadley, a health policy analyst at Georgetown University. For example, a colonoscopy is covered once every 120 months for most Medicare beneficiaries and typically costs nothing for the recipient. However, if a polyp or other suspicious tissue is discovered and removed during the colonoscopy, you may have to pay 20 percent of the Medicare-approved amount for the doctor’s services and a copayment to the medical establishment where the procedure was performed.

With original Medicare, retirees can expect to pay a Part B deductible, copays and coinsurance amounting to 20 percent of the Medicare?approved amount for most services. There’s no annual limit on what retirees could be expected to pay out-of-pocket. “There are types of situations where out-of-pocket costs can go extremely high,” Hoadley says. “If you have major cardiac surgery, your 20 percent coinsurance could be thousands of dollars or possibly tens of thousands of dollars.” Supplemental insurance policies can protect retirees from these sometimes catastrophically high costs.

You can sign up for Medicare Part B at any time during the seven-month period that begins three months before the month you turn 65. But if you don’t sign up during this initial enrollment period, you might have to pay a late enrollment penalty for the rest of your life. Your monthly Part B premium will increase by 10 percent for each 12-month period you were eligible for benefits but didn’t sign up for them. For example, a retiree whose initial enrollment period ended Sept. 30, 2010, but who didn’t sign up for Medicare Part B until March 2013 will pay 20 percent higher premiums due to the two full years he delayed signing up.

People who are still working after age 65 and are covered by an employer’s group health plan can avoid this late enrollment penalty by signing up for Medicare Part B within eight months of the employment or coverage ending. COBRA coverage and retiree health plans are not considered coverage based on current employment for the purpose of avoiding the late enrollment penalty.

Medigap policies, which are sold by private insurance companies, generally pay for some of the health care services Medicare doesn’t cover. However, you only have a small window in which you are guaranteed the right to buy a Medigap policy. There is a one-time Medigap open enrollment period that begins the first month you’re 65 and enrolled in Part B. It lasts for six months, during which you have the right to buy any Medigap policy sold in your state regardless of your current health. After this enrollment period ends, you may no longer have the option to buy a Medigap policy, or it could cost significantly more.

“If you sign up in that initial period, they can’t look at your whole health history and decide to charge you more because you have had cancer in the past or had heart disease,” Hoffman says. “If you don’t sign up in the initial enrollment period, then they can underwrite you. They can charge you more because of your particular health characteristics.” If you delay enrolling in Part B due to group health coverage provided by an employer, your Medigap open enrollment period begins when you sign up for Medicare Part B.

Medicare Part D also has a late enrollment penalty if you don’t sign up when you are first eligible to do so or you go 63 or more days in a row without prescription drug coverage, and the penalty increases the longer you go without coverage. “If you become entitled to Medicare and you decide you don’t want to sign up for a Part D plan – for example, if you are not taking very many medications, if down the road you get sick and you start needing some medications, you will face a late enrollment penalty unless you have had drug coverage that was at least as good,” says Juliette Cubanski, a Medicare policy analyst at the Kaiser Family Foundation. “It makes sense to sign up for Part D when you are first eligible or when you first lose coverage so as to avoid those late enrollment penalties.”

The late enrollment penalty is calculated by multiplying 1 percent of the national base beneficiary premium ($31.17 in 2013) by the number of months you went without Medicare Part D or other prescription drug coverage after becoming eligible for Medicare, and is then added to your monthly premiums for as long as you have Medicare Part D. For example, a retiree who was first eligible for coverage on May 1, 2009, but elected to delay signing up for a Part D plan until Jan. 1, 2013, and didn’t have other coverage during those 43 months will be charged a monthly penalty of $13.40 in 2013 in addition to her plan’s monthly premium.

Read more: The best, most unused credit card perk

Medicare Part D plans have formularies that list which drugs are covered and the cost-sharing requirements. Some Part D plans also require priorauthorization before you can fill certain prescriptions or might require you to try similar lower-cost drugs before a plan will cover a more expensive prescribed drug. There may also be quantity limits on how much medication you can get at a time.

Most Medicare drug plans have a coverage gap that begins after a retiree incurs $2,850 in prescription drug costs and ends when drug costs reach $6,691 in 2014 and catastrophic coverage kicks in. In the coverage gap, retirees are responsible for 47.5 percent of the cost for brand-name drugs and 72 percent of the cost for generic medications in 2014. “Part D has the famous 'doughnut hole' that is going to be closed, but there’s a sizable liability there for people who have substantial prescription drug costs,” Palmer says. Some Part D plans offer additional gap coverage in exchange for higher premiums. The coverage gap is scheduled to be eliminated by 2020.

Don’t expect Medicare to pick up the tab for a nursing home or many other types of long-term care. Only short-term nursing home stays of up to 100 days after a three-day hospital stay are covered. If you need nursing home care for longer than that, you will be responsible for all costs. “Many people who have a need for long-term care services end up spending down whatever resources are available to them and may, at that point, end up qualifying for Medicaid,” Cubanski says. “While Medicare does not cover long-term care expenses, if someone is permanently living in a nursing home or some other type of assisted living facility, Medicaid does cover some of those long-term care expenses. And people can purchase private long-term care insurance that can help cover long-term care.”

Thursday, February 27

4 home insurance mistakes to avoid

4 home insurance mistakes to avoid
Business Week | By Donna Fuscaldo, Fox Business

It may be tempting if you need some cash, but it's best to leave your home insurance policies alone. Here's why.

For homeowners tight on cash, there are plenty of ways to reduce costs. But insurance isn’t the first place that should be trimmed, experts warn.

“We are all concerned with saving money and it is important to shop around when looking for insurance coverage,” says Loretta Worters, a spokeswoman for the Insurance Information Institute. “However some people are reducing their coverage or dropping important coverage plans altogether to try to save money and this can leave you dangerously underinsured in the event of a disaster.”

According to insurance experts, when it comes to homeowners insurance, people often make mistakes that leave them underinsured and holding massive bills if something goes wrong.

Navigating the insurance world to find the best coverage for your budget can be tough, but have the right coverage can prevent future financial headaches if something does go wrong.

Here’s a look at the top mistakes home owners make when it comes to their insurance.

Home owners often mistakenly insure their property for its real estate value instead of the cost to rebuild. When real estate prices go down, that enables them to reduce the amount of insurance on their home and save some money.

“You should make sure that you have enough coverage to completely rebuild your home and replace your belongings,” says Worters, noting that a better way to save is to raise the deductible. “An increase from $500 to $1,000 could save up to 25 percent on your premium payments,” she says.

Natural disasters can happen with little to no notice and can have devastating consequences. For instance, flood insurance is almost always a separate policy.

“One of the largest mistakes that homeowners make is assuming that their policy covers their home and belongings in the event of every potential risk - such as flood,” says Ben Saine, product management director, homeowners insurance at insurer USAA. “Sadly, many people find out the hard way after a major storm that they didn’t have the coverage that they truly needed.” Saine says homeowners need to check to see what natural catastrophes are common in their location and make sure they are adequately covered.

Read more: Washington, Colorado ahead of the curve on pot?

Superstorm Sandy that barreled up the East Coast last October proved that homes not located in designated flood zones can still experience major water damage.

“Many homeowners are unaware they are at risk for flooding, but in fact, 25 percent of all flood losses occur in low risk areas,” says Worters. “Furthermore, with the significant snow fall this winter, spring related flooding may be particularly severe, thus increasing the importance of purchasing flood insurance.”

Everyone likes a deal, so it’s not surprising that many homeowners will go with the cheapest policy they can find—but that could cost them in the long run.

According to Saine, many of the lowest-priced polices only offer coverage at a depreciated amount and don’t give homeowners the best service if there is a loss. He says it’s better to choose a provider that can cover the home adequately and will be easily accessible if something goes wrong.

“You need to ensure that your policy covers all of your home and its belongings at the replacement cost, not at the actual cash value,” says Saine. “For example, if your insurance policy only covers your roof at actual cash value and it’s damaged in a storm, the insurance company would only pay the depreciated amount for your roof. This means you may be stuck paying thousands of dollars out of pocket to replace your roof.”

It’s also important to consider the financial health of the insurer to make sure the company is financial stable to cover any claims.

“It is important to choose a company with competitive prices, but also one that is financially sound and provides good customer service,” says Worters.

Saturday, February 15

A less stressful way to invest in Asia

A less stressful way to invest in Asia
Business Week | By Steve Goldberg, Kiplinger

This fund taps into the upside of emerging markets, while reducing some of the risk.

Emerging-markets stocks haven't been much fun lately. Over the past three years through Jan. 20, the MSCI Emerging Markets index lost an annualized 2.6 percent. True, the MSCI index -- tracked by the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) -- returned a 16.5 percent annualized gain over the past five years, but that was because the category nearly doubled over 2009 and 2010.

Investors in Matthews Asian Growth & Income (MACSX) have achieved better results with a great deal less tumult. Over the past three years through Jan. 17, the fund returned an annualized 4.9 percent -- and it also put up better numbers than the emerging-markets index over the past 10 years. During the past three years, the mutual fund (a member of the Kiplinger 25) has been 38 percent less volatile than the emerging markets index and 28 percent less wobbly than the MSCI EAFE index, which tracks foreign stocks in developed nations.

I'll admit that these comparisons may not be entirely fair. For starters, at last report the Matthews fund had 12 percent of its assets in convertible securities and 6 percent in preferred stocks, both of which are less risky than common stocks (it also had 2 percent in cash). Plus, 8 percent of the fund's stock money is in Japan and 7 percent is in Australia, which are less volatile than emerging markets. In addition, the fund's focus on dividend-paying stocks helps reduce volatility.

I wouldn't suggest that you invest all of your foreign-stock money (or even all your emerging-markets money) in Asia. About one-third of the world's emerging-markets stocks are outside the region. That said, the Asian Growth & Income fund holds a lot of appeal, both because of its record and its shock absorbers.

The fund also has an impressive pedigree: Since 1991, Matthews International Capital Management has focused on investing in Asia, and, by and large, has done it well. "If you ignore Matthews, you're making a big mistake," says William Rocco, the Morningstar analyst who covers the shop's funds. "Growth & Income has consistently been a good down-market performer and has a good long-term record."

It's a propitious time to consider Growth & Income. On average, emerging-markets stocks trade at about 11 times analysts' estimated earnings for the next 12 months. That's a steal compared with the U.S. market, which trades at about 16 times earnings.

But there's a reason that emerging markets are cheap. Developing nations in Asia and elsewhere face enormous challenges. Most important are those facing China, the world's second-largest economy (after the U.S.) and a key driver of economic growth for emerging economies everywhere and especially for those of Asian nations.

China's growth has slowed from an annual rate of more than 10 percent to about 7 percent as the country struggles to convert from an export powerhouse to one that also seeks to satisfy rising demand from Chinese consumers. In addition, Chinese banks are struggling with a large and growing number of bad loans, and the country is facing real estate bubbles in a number of areas. And China badly needs to modernize its legal and financial systems -- not to mention its political system.

But, in my view, China's problems and those facing most other Asian countries (as well as emerging markets elsewhere) are more than adequately reflected in the low stock valuations. China, for instance, trades at 10 times estimated earnings. "That's very cheap relative to its history," says Robert Horrocks, one of the Matthews fund's co-managers.

How has the fund done so well? One explanation, Horrocks says, is its long-term focus. Turnover is about 20 percent annually, suggesting that securities stay in the fund an average of five years. Horrocks and co-manager Kenneth Lowe look for companies, most of them large, with sustainable competitive advantages, the ability to boost prices, low debt and good corporate managers. The pair focus on companies that can raise their payouts, not those with the highest dividend yields. The fund's yield is a scant 0.3 percent.

In terms of sectors, the fund favors insurance, consumer-oriented banks, consumer stocks and telecom. It mostly avoids technology hardware, energy, basic materials and other more cyclical businesses. In terms of countries, the fund usually has little in India (2 percent of assets at last word), where dividends are minuscule, and it overweights Singapore (16 percent) as well as China/Hong Kong (30 percent).

On the negative side, the fund has experienced manager turnover in recent years. Paul Matthews, who founded the firm, was lead manager from 1994 to 2009. Andrew Foster was co-manager from 2005 to 2011, before leaving to launch his own firm. Horrocks has been co-manager since 2009, and Lowe joined in 2011.

The instability is worrisome. So is the recent loss of Jesper Madsen from this fund's slightly friskier sibling, Matthews Asia Dividend (MAPIX), a fine fund that's closed to new investors. Madsen co-managed Growth & Income for one year, leaving in 2011, but he was a key player at Matthews. I think, however, that Matthews has succeeded in effectively passing its strategy to the new managers. I don't expect performance to suffer.

Matthews has shown a commendable willingness to close funds before they get too big. Growth & Income, with $4.3 billion in assets, has plenty of capacity to run more money and is nowhere near closing. Annual expenses are 1.11 percent, higher than I'd like but well below the 1.78 percent average for all Asia mutual funds.

Tuesday, February 11

6 reasons your investments stink

6 reasons your investments stink
| By Brett Arends, MarketWatch

Have you ever looked under the hood of your mutual fund? Many of them suffer from a common set of problems.

Wouldn't it be great if there were an investment portfolio you could just forget about? Wouldn't it be great if you could free yourself from the madness of the market and go fishing?

Some people -- including, naturally enough, many MarketWatch readers -- are fond of playing the great game of the financial markets. But others just want to leave their money to work for them quietly.

I have a personal interest in this. I have come to accept that I cannot manage my own portfolio and write actively about the markets. There are strict rules keeping one's personal holdings a million miles from anything one writes about (and quite rightly so). This means I have to give my best tips to my readers, and then I can't buy them myself.

I've decided I just don't want the stress of managing a portfolio, either. Yes, I think a well-run portfolio can beat the market over time. But to do that you need a free hand. And you need to manage it actively: You need to be able to pounce on stocks, sectors, and even markets, when their price falls too far, and sell those that have risen too high.

So I have come to decide I just want to join Main Street and put my money into those fire-and-forget portfolios.

But then I started looking at them, and I came to a harsh conclusion: All the options on offer are fundamentally flawed. They're rubbish.

That includes "target date" funds. It includes managed portfolios by most financial planners. It includes those cookie-cutter "smartest portfolios" you sometimes read about. It even includes index funds.

I'm not even talking about the failings of "active management" -- the fact that most active, stock-picking mutual fund managers end up underperforming their own benchmarks. I'm talking about the new low-cost stuff as well.

Why are they inadequate?

Check out any target date fund and you'll find that 80 percent of the stocks they own are U.S. stocks. The U.S. accounts for about one-fifth of the world's total economy. Why should it account for most of my stock portfolio?

Even the people running these funds know this is silly. At a dinner a couple of years ago I sat next to the chief of the target date fund operation at one of the biggest fund companies in America. I asked him why nearly all their equity exposure was in the U.S. He sighed. "Because that's what the customers want," he replied.

Have you ever looked under the hood of these "index" funds and exchange-traded funds? The marketing departments of the fund companies claim that they are giving you the maximum diversification, what in Wall Street jargon is sometimes called "the market portfolio."

But it's hooey. Most of these funds are massively overweighted toward a handful of individual stocks, simply because those are already the most popular and "valuable." A fund tracking the Standard & Poor's 500 Index ($INX) has a fifth of its money in just 10 stocks. It puts 100 times as much of your money in Apple (AAPL) as it does in, say, Owens-Illinois (OI). That is not diversification. Indeed these funds automatically invest more in the more popular and fashionable stocks.

There is a great deal of research which says that an "equal weighted" portfolio -- for example, one that just holds the same amount in each of the S&P 500 stocks -- will beat these skewed funds over time.

I am tired of people telling me to put all my faith in that standard panacea, a "balanced" portfolio of stocks and bonds. Bah. Since 1982 stocks and bonds have both gone up together most of the time. And guess what? If they can both go up together, they can both go down together. That's what happened in the 1940s and the 1970s. People who entrusted their money to this simplistic "balanced portfolio" malarkey got royally hosed. Thanks, but no thanks.

They own too many U.S. Treasurys, and too many short-term bonds paying bupkis -- deadweight in the portfolio. They own too few zero-coupon bonds (the best insurance against a stock market crash), too few foreign bonds and too few from countries -- such as Norway, Australia and New Zealand, and certain emerging markets -- with the best credit.

Do I need some gold or gold-mining stocks? Timber? Commodity futures? Natural-resources stocks? Inflation-protected securities? If I need commodities, how do I protect myself against getting absolutely hosed on the fees or trading costs? The one thing I know: By the time the money managers work it out, it will be too late.

For example, there is a lot of research showing that over time cheaper "value" stocks, and those of "high-quality" companies, have produced better returns, with lower risk, than other stocks. It is highly likely this is a persistent feature of the market, based on the flaws in market psychology. Give me a simple portfolio that exploits that.

I'm on a quest to construct the perfect "all-weather" portfolio. Stay tuned.

Thursday, February 6

The hidden costs of bad credit

The hidden costs of bad credit
| By Nicholas Pell, MainStreet

Your credit rating impacts many aspects of your everyday life. Here's how.

Sure, you know that having bad credit can mean paying more for a car loan or a mortgage. You know that it means you can pay more to use your credit cards. But did you know that people with bad credit also pay more for their car insurance and sometimes even for rent? There are more costs of having bad credit than you might know.

Increasingly, employers are using credit reports to help make decisions of hiring and firing. Randy Padawer, a consumer advocate with Lexington law states that more than half of all major companies are using background checks as part of a pre-employment screening. "I think it's unfair," he says, but quickly adds "it's something that consumers must remember when they're doing something as mundane as paying a credit card bill."

Gail Cunningham, vice president of membership and public relations for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling points out the reason why credit reports are increasingly used in hiring decisions. "Potential employers might view your credit report as an overall reflection of your responsibility."

What's the cost? Tim Lucas, vice president of mortgage at MyMortgageInsider.com, breaks it down. "Say that you have to take a job that pays $10,000 a year less because you have bad credit," he says. "That's $100,000 over ten years." While the math is obvious, what might not be is that, in the case of employment, you might be losing more than you would because of high interest rates on a mortgage.

"Car insurance is a big one," says Lucas, adding that drivers sometimes pay double what they would pay if they had better credit scores. Why are car insurance companies pulling your credit report to see what you should pay? "Car insurance companies assume that if you're not responsible with your finances that you might not be a responsible driver," Lucas says.

It's not just car insurance, either. "All kinds of insurance companies are pulling credit reports," explains Padawer, adding that "There's a correlation between the number of claims filed and the total cost of these claims and a person's credit report."

Perhaps the worst hidden cost of bad credit is your apartment. Padawer points out that "rentals are just about the only thing that isn't on your credit report." This means that you might be the most responsible person in the world when it comes to paying your rent on time, but your landlord will never know it: your rental history appears nowhere on your credit report.

On the other hand, Padawer is quick to point out that "there are almost no landlords who won't want to look at your credit report." To feel comfortable with renting to you, a landlord might charge you a double deposit -- no small fee, especially in a larger, more expensive city like Los Angeles or New York.

Lucas is somewhat less sympathetic. "If someone doesn't pay their credit card bills and is always late with their car payment, there's a good chance that they're going to be late with their rent," Lucas said.

If you decide that you want to own a home, you can almost always expect to pay a higher mortgage bill every month; your interest rates are going to be higher.

While you might know that you're paying higher interest rates because you have bad credit, you might not know the actual cost.

Cunningham advises clients to sit down with all of their bills and look at what the interest rates are on each of them. Then, look at what you're paying in real dollars every month. "This can add up to hundreds of dollars a month," she says.

Your monthly cash flow can be impacted another way: the cost of getting your utilities turned on. People with bad credit have to pay larger deposits to get water, electricity and heat turned on. Cunningham points out that you might even pay more for your cell phone every month because you have to get a prepaid instead of a regular monthly account.

Padawer and she agree that there's a far more insidious cost to having bad credit: the psychic toll. "Debt is a monster that lives with you 24/7," says Cunningham. "It makes it harder to be a good parent, spouse or employee." Padawer mentions some more concrete matters. "Debt and bad credit often lead to depression, bad self-esteem and even divorce."

The message is clear: if you have bad credit, start working to make it better. If you have good credit, maintain it. It's far easier to lose good credit than to gain it back.

Thursday, January 30

5 reasons singles need life insurance, too

5 reasons singles need life insurance, too
| By Neda Jafarzadeh, The Fiscal Times

While singles likely need less coverage than married couples, they often have relatives who would be affected financially by their deaths.

Life insurance is something only married people need, right? As with so many personal finance questions, the answer to this one is -- it depends.

There are several reasons you might want to purchase life insurance even when you’re single, though you may need less coverage than someone who wants to provide for a surviving spouse or children. That's because there may be other family members or loved ones who could be affected financially in the event of your death.

Many single people are now pondering buying life insurance, given that more adult Americans today are single than are married and that the median age at first marriages has never been higher. (It's currently 27 for women, and 29 for men.) Young adults today are also waiting longer to buy homes or have children, milestones typically associated with the purchase of life insurance.

Life insurers are actively reaching out to millennials (who are more likely to be single) by making their offerings more web- and mobile-friendly and by marketing their policies in unexpected places like Wal-Mart and Costco. Before buying a policy, use a calculator at sites like LifeHappens.org to understand how much insurance you need.

Many consumers get a basic life policy through work, which could cover the needs of a single person without dependents. Remember, though, that if you leave your job, your coverage doesn’t come with you.

Here are five reasons to consider purchasing a policy, even if you're not married

Not every young person needs life insurance – and if you haven’t yet established an emergency fund or you’re still living on your parents’ couch, buying life insurance certainly shouldn’t be a top priority. If, however, you’re making the maximum contribution to your retirement fund and have six months of expenses stashed in a savings account, you may want to consider buying a policy.

Waiting to get coverage until you’re married or have children could make a policy much more costly. A $500,000, 30-year term policy for a healthy, non-smoking male in Chicago costs about $35 per month. The same policy for a 45-year-old runs more than $60 per month, according to calculations by Term4Sale.com.

Another reason not to wait: The older you get, the more likely you are to contract a chronic health condition, which could push up your life insurance premiums or make you ineligible for coverage at all. Buying a policy now will lock in coverage while you’re still in good health and qualify for the best rates.

If your parents (or other family member or friend) co-signed a student loan or a mortgage with you, they’ll be fully on the hook for the amount owed in the event of your passing. In addition to debt, burial costs can also be expensive – the average funeral costs more than $7,000 -- and it can set back loved ones without a significant amount of savings.

If your funeral or your debts will be a significant financial hardship for someone else, consider getting a low-cost policy to cover those expenses -- a 10-year term policy naming that person as the beneficiary could take care of such expenses. With unemployment still stubbornly high and most Americans with dangerously low savings accounts, the last burden a grieving family member needs is a loan company hounding him or her for payments.

This is probably the most important reason a single person should purchase life insurance. Nearly 16 million unmarried parents live with their children, according to the U.S. Census. Even if you don’t have kids, there may be others who depend on you financially, including elderly parents who need caretaking or special needs siblings. The right life insurance policy can serve as a financial safety net for those you care about most.

Work with a financial planner to determine how much life insurance you need on top of any other assets you have in order to insure that your dependents are properly cared for financially after you’re gone.

If you’re a small business owner with partners, a life insurance policy can allow your partners to more seamlessly purchase your portion of the business. Partners in the company would enter into a buy-sell agreement, buying policies (either as individuals or as a company) on the lives of the co-owners with the understanding that the payout would go to the deceased partner’s heirs without giving them a stake in the company itself.

If there’s a cause that you’re passionate about or you’ve got someone you’d like to take care of financially (even if they’re not dependent on you now), purchasing a life insurance policy can help meet those goals. This kind of purchase only makes sense if you can comfortably afford the policy after funding emergency and retirement savings, as well as paying down any high interest debt.

If you do buy a policy as a single, it’s important to re-evaluate your insurance coverage after life events, such as the birth of child or a marriage, to make sure you're still appropriately covered and to update your beneficiaries. If coverage purchased now becomes inadequate for your needs at a later date, you can buy supplemental coverage, rather than starting from scratch.

Sunday, January 26

6 things to know when choosing a bank

6 things to know when choosing a bank
| By Constance Gustke, Bankrate.com

Your bank is there to serve, but don't forget that it's also serving itself. Here are some things to consider when you're looking for a place to put your money.

Should you trust your banker to watch out for you?

Not always. They have incentives and goals to meet, such as referring a specified number of clients each month to a department that handles mortgages or car loans, says Robert Laura, president of Synergos Financial Group in Howell, Mich.

The dilemma: A banker's bottom line may not be the same as yours. "For banks, it's about gaining wallet share," Laura says.

The remedy is to know exactly what banking products you need. Here are six things to keep in mind when shopping for a bank.

Many bank programs have tiered interest rates for higher deposits, Laura says. For example, jumbo certificates of deposit, which usually have $100,000 minimum deposits, typically offer higher yields than CDs in smaller amounts, he says. "Bankers want to capture more dollars," Laura says.

Multimillion-dollar clients may even get additional insurance over the $250,000 deposit limit per bank set by Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. How? A bank may offer a Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service, or CDARS, says Greg McBride, CFA, senior financial analyst at Bankrate. Banks belonging to the CDARS network let wealthy investors spread large CD deposits among different banks while still being insured.

Currently, more than 3,000 financial institutions -- largely medium and small banks -- offer this extra insurance protection.

If you plan to travel often, beware of extra ATM costs. Bank of America belongs to the Global ATM Alliance, which offers free ATM withdrawals internationally at member banks. This can reduce fees overseas if you have an account at one of those banks. But banks that don't belong to the alliance may charge processing fees that quickly add up.

In certain countries, you might be charged differently when using a debit card versus the credit card side of a debit card. Ask your bank what these additional fees might be before you travel overseas.

Beware, you may not see these fees until you get your monthly statement, says Paul Schaus, president of bank consulting firm CCG Catalyst in Phoenix. "Read your account disclosure statement before you go," he says.

Longtime customers with multiple accounts can secure better account deals, such as getting fees waived or nabbing higher yields, McBride says. "And branch managers have the power to negotiate them," he adds.

Some banks even have overdraft fee-waiver policies, granting a set number of two or three each year. Still, repeat offenders are less likely to get waivers.

Also, online banking customers may get better terms than in-branch bank customers. The reason is the bank's lower cost of service online, which can be passed along to customers, McBride says.

"Everything is negotiable," Laura says. "You may get a 5- or 10-basis-point increase on a CD yield, if you ask."

Schaus says smaller banks and credit unions are the most likely to give higher rates and waivers. "When dealing with big banks, you're just a number," he says.

Banks may charge an annual percentage rate on a credit card as high as 30 percent, Laura says. And reasons for the high rate run the gamut, from missing a payment window by just one day or skipping a payment. To find out what penalties can be levied, check the credit card pamphlet that states terms and conditions, he says.

"When reading it, you may wonder why anyone uses a credit card," he says.

Relationship pricing, where banks reward consumers with multiple accounts, may be more beneficial for consumers than just stand-alone bank accounts, McBride says. "But you still need to shop around," he says. "Compare each account against the competition."

Some banks put clauses in their contracts that mandate the use of arbitration rather than jury trials when disputes arise.

"Banks would rather go through arbitration than trials, because jury members see deep pockets when judging a company," Schaus says. Arbitrators tend to compromise more, he says.

Bankrate's McBride offers this final tip: Become an educated consumer, so you can discern a good offer from a less competitive one.

Thursday, January 16

Car insurance when you have no car

Car insurance when you have no car
| By Michele Lerner, Bankrate.com

Even if you don't own a vehicle, instances will pop up when you still need insurance.

Car ownership is declining, particularly among younger Americans. Many people, especially in urban areas, now prefer to use a car-sharing service or occasionally borrow or rent a car if they need to drive somewhere.

The challenge is that drivers must always have car insurance coverage when they're behind the wheel. For some drivers, a "nonowner car insurance" policy may be the most economical way to protect themselves and their assets in case of an accident.

These policies typically offer only liability coverage, says Dan Ramsey, an independent insurance agent with Brandt, Ramsey and Associates in Alexandria, Va.

"Nonowner car insurance provides protection for an accident when you're at fault, so it covers the other driver's car, but not yours, and the other driver's injuries, but not yours," he says.

The policies generally don't include comprehensive or collision coverage for damage to the car because you don't own the vehicle. Ramsey says the insurance will cover you in any car you drive during the policy period.

People buy nonowner car insurance to make sure they're insulated from the potentially high financial hit from an at-fault accident, says Steven Visco, president of C.H. Edwards Inc., an insurance agency in Farmingdale, N.Y. "For instance, one client is a wealthy attorney who lives in Manhattan and doesn't own a car, but he has assets to protect," Visco says. "He's renting a place in the Hamptons this summer and will regularly rent a car."

"This policy offers extra liability protection and is cheaper than buying the liability policy from the rental car company," he adds. And don't expect to rely on your credit card because liability coverage is not included in the rental car insurance that cards provide.

You may want to consider nonowner car insurance if you have no car of your own and:

You rent cars often."If you pay $10 per day for a rental company's liability coverage and rent cars for 50 or 60 days or more every year, a nonowner insurance policy could be less costly," Visco says. But you'll still need to buy the other coverages sold at the rental counter.

You belong to a car-sharing service, such as Zipcar. The service will provide some insurance coverage, but, "If you hurt someone in a car accident, the liability lawsuit is likely to be against both you and the car-sharing company," says Visco. "You may want to look into protecting your assets from a lawsuit with your own liability coverage."

You borrow other people's cars often. When you borrow a car from a friend or a relative, the car owner's insurance covers you, says Ron Moore, senior product manager for MetLife Auto & Home in Minneapolis. However, if you're borrowing a car from someone you don't know well, you may not know if their liability coverage is adequate to protect you. "If you're at fault and the other driver's injuries exceed the car owner's liability, then you may be stuck paying the bill," Moore says. That's where a nonowner policy would help.

You have a problematic driving record. "In Virginia, the state mandates nonowner car insurance coverage for drivers who don't own a car but have had a major problem driving, such as a DUI or DWI, or some other major violation like driving on a suspended license," says Ramsey. He adds that the premium for this mandated liability coverage is about $600 for six months.

Nonowner car insurance typically doesn't carry a deductible, says Moore. Premiums can be very low, based on your driving record and the amount of driving you do, he says.

"Normally the minimum premium is about $250 for six months or even a year," says Visco. "The premiums are higher for drivers with a bad driving record, and they may not qualify at all."

Moore says premiums for nonowner car insurance are typically about 50 percent of normal car insurance premiums, but they vary from company to company and state to state.

If you don't own a car but still drive regularly, you may want to get a nonowner car insurance quote to find out if this coverage is appropriate and affordable for you.

Site Search