Showing posts with label looking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label looking. Show all posts

Friday, April 11

Looking for higher dividends from abroad

Looking for higher dividends from abroad
Business Week | By Bruce W. Fraser, Bankrate

The grass may or may not be greener on the other side, but the yields are often higher. Here's how to pick up some good-quality, foreign dividend stocks.

Looking for some yield? Who isn't, these days?

When investors seek dividend yields, many only consider U.S. stocks. U.S. companies paid out a record $311.8 billion in dividends in 2013, beating the 2012 record of $281.5 billion, according to Standard & Poor's. But traditionally, foreign company stocks sport higher yields.

"It's a huge universe, and it's true that most foreign stock markets do have higher dividend yields than the U.S.," says Josh Peters, editor of Morningstar's DividendInvestor newsletter.

With about 67 percent of the world's dividends coming from outside the U.S., according to MSCI, it's worth looking beyond national borders.

"The dividend yield of the U.S. stock market using the S&P 500 ($INX) as a benchmark has been in the 2 percent range, plus or minus," says Peters. "That's one of the lowest yields in the world. Currently, 3 percent to 4 percent in yields are readily attainable in a lot of foreign markets."

So how do you pick good, high-yielding foreign dividend stocks? You can either choose them individually or invest in a mutual fund with foreign equity holdings that pay dividends.

Another option is to buy an exchange-traded fund, or ETF, that focuses on foreign dividend stocks. The vast majority of ETFs track a market index. "The idea behind buying is you believe in buying high-yielding equities, but don't want an active strategy," says Morningstar ETF analyst Abby Woodham. "You just want to buy a whole market."

"The rationale for buying a foreign dividend-focused ETF is the same as buying a domestic ETF," she adds. "Most of the total return on equity markets comes from dividends."

While neither research firms Morningstar nor Lipper categorizes funds by whether they pay dividends, Lipper has two groups of mutual funds that hold foreign dividend-paying stocks: global equity income funds and international equity income funds.

At Morningstar, senior fund analyst Gregg Wolper says foreign dividend-paying funds are likely to fall into the large-value-fund category.

Many financial pros searching for either domestic or foreign dividend-paying stocks are value managers, meaning they search for stocks thought to be undervalued in relation to their fair value.

Don Schreiber Jr., CEO of WBI Investments in Little Silver, N.J., says U.S. stocks are looking relatively expensive. "There are good value-shopping opportunities in international dividend stocks right now," says Schreiber, the co-author of "All About Dividend Investing."

Although Schreiber describes himself as a value manager, "We go beyond just the search for value," he says. "We buy stocks when they're cheap, when they're trading at a low price from where they normally trade. This way you have a high probability of being able to sell to somebody else at a more expensive price."

Daniel Kern, president and chief investment officer of Advisor Partners in Walnut Creek, Calif., says the key things his firm looks for are "whether the company has a history of paying dividends, whether they have a consistent cash flow necessary to sustain dividends and have a balance sheet to provide a stable business foundation."

Another strategy is to buy a stock when its yield is low and wait until it goes up. Both Novartis (NVS), a Swiss pharmaceutical company with a significant presence in the U.S., and Canadian beer company Molson Coors (TAP) were yielding below their norms in early 2013, but are expected to increase their dividend growth rates over time, according to value manager Karl H. Graf, founder of Graf Financial Advisors in Wayne, N.J.

"Dividend yield is not our primary consideration," says Graf. "Of course, we consider it. To us, what matters most is that the dividends are likely to go up year over year. What we're interested in is the growth rate and the sustainability of it."

For his two model portfolios, Peters looks for companies exhibiting good cash flows and growth prospects, paying current yields ranging from 3 percent to 5 percent, and preferably with no tax withheld. Three favorites that fit these criteria are British stocks: Royal Dutch Shell (RDS.A), Vodafone (VOD) and pharmaceutical GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Notably, all three pay dividends without withholding taxes.

Foreign governments routinely withhold 10 percent to 15 percent in taxes from foreign dividend payments. The U.K. is an exception. Because the U.S. and U.K. have a tax treaty, there is no withholding tax on dividends paid to U.S. investors.

"I figure Shell's dividend will grow 4 percent to 6 percent a year in the foreseeable future," says Peters. "Vodafone's dividend has been growing at 7 percent a year lately, but it's likely to be flat for the next year or two before starting to grow again. That said, the cash Vodafone is now collecting from its stake in Verizon Wireless minimizes the risk of any dividend cut. GlaxoSmithKline faces limited patent expirations, unlike many pharmaceuticals in the U.S."

Because foreign taxes are withheld, generally dividend-paying stocks and funds should be housed in a regular taxable account. Otherwise, if you own the foreign stock or fund in an individual retirement account or 401k, you don't get any credit for those taxes withheld, says John M. Smartt Jr., a CPA and registered investment adviser in Knoxville, Tenn.

Of course, investing in foreign dividend-paying stocks and funds is not without risks, which include currency fluctuations and political and economic uncertainties. So you might want to stick to U.S. multinationals with businesses that invest overseas.

"A multinational like Coca-Cola (KO) or General Electric (GE) based in the U.S. is going to pay dividends in dollars," says Peters, "so currency fluctuations are not a consideration."

Accounting and reporting standards in foreign countries also tend "to be less rigorous and regulatory oversight not particularly zealous," Peters says, in contrast to U.S. companies "whose statements are in English and have to conform to regularity standards you're familiar with."

Also, the vast majority of companies in the U.S. pay dividends every three months, and they are less likely to cut their dividends. Overseas companies commonly pay dividends semiannually or annually.

Financial pros also warn against being attracted to a dividend-paying stock solely by the high yield. Rather, they advise, you should follow a total return approach, which combines income and capital appreciation. High-dividend yields sometimes tend to be unsustainable.

Saturday, May 4

Insurer's 'looking glass' into homes

Insurer's 'looking glass' into homes
| By Ed Leefeldt, Insure.com

A new insurance industry innovation -- a data recorder for homes -- is raising questions about privacy and efficiency.

Would you let your home insurance company monitor your house?

Last fall, United Services Automobile Association (USAA), the country's leading auto, home and life insurer for military personnel, received a patent for a data recorder that can be installed in a home for observation.

USAA's device will record conditions that "have led to damage or destruction of the building" or to "forecast the possibility of future damage or destruction."

The device can track the temperature, wind speed and mechanical vibrations as they affect the house, as well as humidity, which could cause mold in the walls.

Sounds like a good idea? Yes, for the insurance company, but not necessarily for the homeowner.

A home data recorder isn't a new concept. Companies like ADT and Tyco already provide sophisticated electronic sensor technologies to remotely monitor almost everything that happens in a house or office, including vibrations that could indicate a break-in. But USAA's device offers increased leverage for the folks at the insurance company by giving them a looking glass into your house.

Based in San Antonio, privately held USAA is owned by its policyholders and did not want to discuss its new product. Spokesperson Rebecca Hirsch said USAA would talk only about its innovation efforts in general, and not this patent in particular.

Neither the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America nor the American Insurance Association, both of which represent property-casualty insurers, would comment either.

Robert Hartwig, president of the Insurance Information Institute, which also represents the industry, said that even though he hadn't heard of the product, "it sounds like telematics for homes." But he did predict that "this device will aid insurers in underwriting property."

Telematics devices are plugged into cars and offered by auto insurers such as Progressive, which calls its on-board monitoring system Snapshot. This monitoring device records people's driving habits: distance driven, time of day, amount of times the brake is used and how hard. Driving at night when fewer cars are on the road usually lowers rates, as does avoiding the start-stop braking that can lead to accidents.

This invaluable information is used to price "pay as you drive" or "usage-based" auto insurance policies.

Consumer advocates agree that this could be a boon for home insurance companies. "By utilizing tools like this . . . insurers can better manage their risk exposure," says Birny Birnbaum, executive director of the Center for Economic Justice in Austin, Texas.

But insurers could also use that data to make decisions on policyholder claims and underwriting, as well as other decisions.

"The recent history of insurers' use of data mining indicates that insurers are using these new technologies to simply exclude certain risk exposure," says Birnbaum. In simple terms: If the insurer detects high winds around your house, it might cancel the policy.

Robert Hunter, the director of insurance for the Consumer Federation of America, is also suspicious. "Insurers have been using more and more black boxes [technology which is only understood by insurers] to systematically underpay claims," he says.

USAA's data recorder might have helped insurers expedite claim payouts after Hurricane Katrina in 2005. At a cost of $110 billion it is the most expensive storm in history.

There was constant wrangling between insurers and policyholders across the Southeast, from Florida to Louisiana, as to whether Katrina's 125-mile per hour winds had knocked down coastal homes or whether they had actually been flattened by the 30-foot tidal surge. If the cause was wind, then home insurers such as USAA would be responsible for claims. If the cause was water, then the federal flood insurance program would have to pay those with flood policies.

Consumer groups say that it's hard to find a benefit for homeowners who install a home-data recorder like USAA's unless, like Progressive's Snapshot program for usage-based auto insurance, the insurer offers a discount to those who accept. In which case, "this technology offers the promise of insurers moving towards a greater partnership with consumers to promote loss prevention," says Birnbaum.

For example, if a homeowner was advised to lower the humidity after an event such as a flood, he or she could save their walls, flooring and even prevent illness caused by inhaling mold spores. But this would require communication between the insurer, which needs to monitor the device regularly, and the homeowner. Otherwise, it is similar to the black box in an airplane, which can only tell investigators why the plane crashed after the fact.

Consumer advocates warn that homeowners should be wary of devices that monitor you or your property without any benefit to you.

Site Search